Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Appellants vs M/S Nutech Vainish Udyog
2024 Latest Caselaw 370 UK

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 370 UK
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2024

Uttarakhand High Court

Appellants vs M/S Nutech Vainish Udyog on 18 March, 2024

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                AT NAINITAL
           HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
                             AND
             HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PANKAJ PUROHIT

                          18TH MARCH, 2024

             SPECIAL APPEAL No.574 OF 2015

State of Uttarakhand and others.
                                                              ...Appellants

                                   Versus

M/s Nutech Vainish Udyog, Munikireti and others.

                                                            ...Respondents

Counsel for the appellant/State.    :   Mr. K.N. Joshi,      learned   Deputy
                                        Advocate General.

Counsel for respondent.             :   Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, learned senior
                                        counsel assisted by Mr. Mohd. Matloob,
                                        learned counsel.

JUDGMENT :

(per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)

Heard learned counsels for the parties at

length.

2. A perusal of the order dated 14.09.2015,

passed by the learned Single Judge, shows that the

learned Single Judge had examined the Annexure No.5,

dated 02.03.2007, wherein, it had been observed that

the stamp duty shall be recovered on the sale certificate

subject to the final decision of the writ petition before

the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

3. This Court has again perused the Annexure

No.5, at page no.33, of the paper book where the

observations made by the learned Single Bench is also

reflected in the order Annexure No.5. Once the

Department themselves has admitted that they have

accepted the stamp duty subject to the final decision of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court

decision has now come that only 2% stamp duty can be

recovered, respondents-State will refund the amount

accepted beyond 2%.

4. In the counter affidavit filed, by the State, at

page no.73, it is mentioned that the appellant-State has

deposited the draft of 7.4%, and the number of draft

has also given along with the cost amount of

Rs.208350/-, which is reproduced as under:-

लीसा लौट लेखा................................................िटहरी................................................ वन प्रभाग

पत्राक.................... नीलाम......................... िदनांक 314/9 31-10-07

1- उपज 2006 2- नीलाम की ितिथ 18.8.07

3- लौट सं० 424, 425/07-08 4- लीसा की मात्रा 200 कु०.

5- नाम क्रेता मै० सुरे�ा केिमक�, ढालवाला

6- लीसा दर 2250 7- मूल्य 450000/-

8- अनुमोदन .............वन संर�क भागीरथी वृ� पत्रांक 627/9-9 िद०-30.8.07

9- लीसा उठाने की अंितम ितिथ

िववरण ब�क ड�ा�/ट�ेजरी चालान सं० ितिथ धनरािश

10- मू� वसूली 92.60% ड�ा� सं० 605805 िद०- 208350.00 9.10.07 एस०बी०आई० ऋिषकेश 208350.00 606029 िद०-19.10.07 एस०बी०आई० ऋिषकेश 16650.00 7.4% ड�ा� सं० 605806 िद०- 9.10.07 16650.00 606030 िद०-19.10.07 450000.00 एस०बी०आई० ऋिषकेश एस०बी०आई० ऋिषकेश

11- िवल� शु�

12-िजला प�रषद् लाभांश 645808 िद०-9.10.07 एस०बी०आई० 1000.00 5/-प्रित कु�ल ऋिषकेश

13. म�ी सिमित चैक सं० 0057402 िद० 19.10.07 11275.00 शु� 2.5 प्रितशत एस०बी०आई० ऋिषकेश

14-�ापार कर 4 % वािण� कर ड�ा� सं० 605807 10483.00 (1) फम� की िद०-9.10.07 एस०बी०आई० ऋिषकेश पंजीकरण सं.

ड�ा� सं० 606031 िद०-19.10.07 एस०बी०आई० ऋिषकेश 10483.00

(2) िबक्री कर के�ीय उ�ादन शु� चा0नं0

9122410/154 िद०-27.10.07 74160.00

15- आयकर - फम� �ारा प्र�ुत

16-स�ूित� िववरण रव�ा सं० ितिथ िटनों की सं�ा गोल वजन कु�ल म� शु� वजन कु�ल म�

47/20 िद० 9.10.07 613 106.13 100.00

50/20 िद 19.10.07 623 106.23 100.00

सलं�क

1- लौट लेखा प्रभागीय वनािधकारी िटहरी वन प्रभाग की सेवा म� मय संल�क के आव�क काय�वाही हेतु प्रेिषत।

2- 92.6% ड�ा� -        2 न०

   7.4% ड�ा�       -   2 न०

3- िजला प�रषद -        1 नं०

4- 4% बैट-             2 नं०
   िनकासी रव�ा -       2 न०

   योग-                9 न०

                                                                                                       ह० अ��

                                                                                        लीसा भ�ार अिधकारी
                                                                                                 ऋिषकेश।




5. Since this amount has already been deposited,

no ground is made out to interfere in the judgment of

the learned Single Judge. The special appeal is

dismissed. The State shall refund the excess stamp duty

to the respondent petitioner.

______________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.

_________________ PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.

Dt: 18th March, 2024 NR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter