Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 59 UK
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE RITU BAHRI, C.J.
AND
SRI JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
14TH FEBRUARY, 2024
SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 489 OF 2018
U.K. Warehousing Corporation & another. ...Appellants
Versus
Bihari Lal .........Respondent
Counsel for the appellants : Mr. Parikshit Saini.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. V.D. Bisen.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court
made the following
JUDGMENT :
(per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
Uttarakhand State Waterhousing Corporation
has come up against the order of the learned Single
Judge 30.05.2018, whereby the writ petition filed by
Bihari Lal has been allowed, keeping in view that when
show cause notice was given to the petitioner on
22.06.2016, he was only given one day's time to give
his reply and this time was not sufficient and it violated
the principle of natural justice.
2. Keeping in view the fact that the writ petition
was allowed, the only grievance of the appellant is that
in this order, it has been held that in Regulation 16 of the U.P. State Waterhousing Corporation Staff
Regulations, there is no provision for dismissal of
service, though under the Regulation, there is a
provision.
3. This Special Appeal is disposed of only by
clarifying that in Regulation 16, 'dismissal of service'
may also be made. However, in the present case, since
the show cause notice dated 22.06.2016 was only
given to the respondent to file his reply and there was
no mention that his service will be terminated, a fresh
order in accordance with law will be passed by the
appellants after giving due opportunity of hearing to
the respondent.
_____________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
__________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Dt: 14th February, 2024 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!