Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 793 UK
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2024
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI RAKESH THAPLIYAL
29th April, 2024
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION No.37 of 2023
The Chief Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Uttarakhand
.....Revisionist
Versus
M/s Uttam Rice and Seeds Pvt. Ltd.
........Respondent
Counsel for the revisionist : Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief
Holder.
Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, learned
Counsel for the respondent
counsel.
Judgment: (per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
Aggrieved against the judgment dated
21.09.2021, the State has filed this revision. Learned
counsel for the parties are not disputing that similar
issue has been considered by this Court in the revision
filed by the Commissioner, Commercial Tax vs.
Uttaranchal Seeds & Tarai Development Corporation
Ltd., in CTR No.14 of 2009, which has been dismissed on
08.09.2009.
2. This Court has already dismissed the revision
of the Revenue by observing that "seeds of all kinds" will
not make a rejected seeds, inferior seeds or superior
seeds, liable to pay tax. The Legislature, by using the
2
expressions "seeds of all kinds" has clearly manifested
its intention of including actually each and every kind of
seeds, except of course oil seeds, from the imposition of
tax liability.
3. Since the rejected seeds cannot be utilized
even for taking out oil, this appeal is also dismissed.
___________________________
Ritu Bahri, CJ.
___________________________
Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Dt: 29th April, 2024 NR/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!