Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 722 UK
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI, C.J.
AND
MR. RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
16TH APRIL, 2024
WRIT PETITION (MB) NO. 114 OF 2024
Dilshad Ahmad .......Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others. ..............Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. S.K. Mandal, learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Chief
Standing Counsel with Mr. Gajendra
Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for the
State.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court
made the following
JUDGMENT :
(per: Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
1. Learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State
has informed that pursuant to the tender notice, six
persons have already participated. The conditions of
the tender notice are Annexure-1.
2. Grievance of the petitioner is that as per one
of the conditions of the tender-notice (Annexure-1), the
person, who submits an application for tender, should
have experience of three years and turn-over of Rs. 3
crores, and the other condition is that he should
produce a Trade License of one year.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further
states that at Page-10 of the Paper-Book, it is stated
that the minimum average annual turnover of the
bidder should be 100 Lacs for one year. But as per the
above, it shall be 3 crores for three years.
4. Keeping in view that applications have been
received from six participants, who have fulfilled all
these conditions, no case is made out to interfere with
the tender process initiated by the respondents
(Annexure-1).
5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
_____________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
__________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Dt: 16th April, 2024 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!