Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1461 UK
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2023
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 756 of 2023
Ganga Sagar Gupta ..............Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others ...........Respondents
Present:-
Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pooran Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mohd.
Saify, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 3.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
By means of the instant petition, the petitioner
seeks the following reliefs:-
a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of
Mandamus commanding and directing the
respondents to pay the arrears of subsequent
to the grant of benefit of 7th Pay Commission to
the employees of Centralized services of the
Sugar Mills of Cooperative as well as public
sector.
b) Issue an other order or direction which this
Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in view
of facts and circumstances of the case.
c) Award cost of the petition.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the
petitioner would submit that the controversy is already
covered by the judgment and order dated 12.05.2023,
passed in Writ Petition (S/S) No.720 of 2023, Ramjivan
Verma vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ("the
petition").
4. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2
and 3 would admit that the issue is covered by the
judgment, passed in the petition.
5. The Court takes on record the statement
given by the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
6. Instant petition is decided in terms of the
judgment and order dated 12.05.2023, passed in the
petition.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 23.05.2023 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!