Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 787 UK
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
and Registrar's
order with
Signatures
23.03.2023 SPA No. 441 of 2021
SPA No. 442 of 2021
SPA No. 443 of 2021
SPA No. 444 of 2021
SPA No. 445 of 2021
Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.
Sri Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned counsel for the appellants.
Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondent-THDC.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the
impugned judgment was rendered in a batch of Writ
Petitions. He submits that, in respect of the Writ Petition
preferred by Gyan Singh Panwar, i.e. WPMS No. 346 of
2016, Special Appeal No. 381 of 2021 was preferred
before this Court, which was dismissed on 20.12.2021.
The said petitioner preferred a Special Leave Petition
before the Supreme Court, which was registered as Special
Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8073-8074/2022, and vide
order dated 20.05.2022, the Supreme Court has issued
notice to the respondents. He has tendered in Court the
order passed by the Supreme Court on 20.05.2023. He
states that the said Special Leave Petition is still pending
consideration before the Supreme Court, and, therefore,
seeks an adjournment of the present Special Appeals, to await the judgment of the Supreme Court.
At his request, adjourned to 20.10.2023.
Liberty is granted to learned counsels to move an
application for expedited hearing, once the decision of the
Supreme Court is rendered.
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) (Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
23.03.2023 23.03.2023
Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!