Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 750 UK
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
21.03.2023 A.O. No. 87 of 2023
Hon'ble Vipin Sanghi, C.J.
Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Mr. Shashank Saun, learned counsel for the appellant.
By the impugned judgment, the Family
Court, while rejecting the claim for custody
of the minor child made by the appellant-
father has been granted visitation rights to
the appellant.
Prima facie, it appears to us that the
visitation rights, as granted, are very less,
and not in the best interest of the minor
child.
We are, therefore, inclined to issue
notice to the respondent to re-settle the
visitation rights granted to the appellant.
Presently, the appellant has been granted
the right to have the video call with the
minor child on every Sunday for half an hour between 06:00 to 06:30 P.M.
Till the next date, we permit the
grandmother of the minor child, i.e., the
appellant's mother, to also participate in the
said video call.
Issue notice to the respondent
returnable on 22.05.2023, on the application
seeking condonation of delay, as well as in
the appeal, by all permitted modes, including
electronically.
List the matter on 22.05.2023.
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) (Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
21.03.2023 21.03.2023
Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!