Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 590 UK
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders
SL. or proceedings
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No or directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
WPMS 189/2023
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. T.S. Phartiyal, Additional CSC, for the State/respondents.
Petitioner has made a representation to District Magistrate claiming benefit of a judgment, rendered by a Division Bench of this Court, which provides that agriculturists of hill region may be considered for the benefit of Government Order dated 8.3.1985.
It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is entitled to benefit of said Government Order, as his name is recorded in Category V of the revenue record.
Mr. Phartiyal, learned State Counsel, however, contends that bhumidhari right cannot be granted to petitioner as the judgment relied upon by petitioner provides only for grant of patta, and not the bhumidhari right.
Be that as it may, since petitioner has made a representation which is said to be pending, therefore, writ petition is disposed of with direction to District Magistrate to examine petitioner's claim and take decision, as per law, within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 3.3.2023 Pr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!