Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2572 UK
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2023
CLCON No. 439 of 2021 Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Hem Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
The petitioners have brought to the notice of the Court the wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.03.2017, passed in WPSS No. 857 of 2016 and connected matters as well as judgment and order dated 18.12.2020, passed in Special Appeal No. 832 of 2017, State of Uttarakhand and others Vs. Baldev Singh Chauhan and others and connected appeals.
The response affidavit has been filed. Learned State counsel would submit that the orders of this Court have already been challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 16865-17001 of 2021 and the operation of the impugned judgment and orders has been stayed.
Since the operation of the judgment and orders has been stayed, of which non compliance is reported, it appears that there is no occasion to consider the contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition may be disposed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be given a liberty that in case, the cause of action survives, they may be given liberty to agitate the matter.
The petition is disposed of with the liberty as above.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 29.08.2023 Jitendra
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!