Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 988 UK
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ALOK KUMAR VERMA
12TH APRIL, 2023
WRIT PETITON (CRIMINAL) NO.543 OF 2023
Smt. Aasu Devi & Another ...... Petitioners
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand & Others ......Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Mohd. Alauddin,
Advocate.
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Rakesh Joshi, Brief
Nos.1 to 3. Holder.
Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this
Court made the following judgment :
(Per : Shri Alok Kumar Verma, J.)
Present writ petition has been filed with the
following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus commanding and directing to the
respondent nos.1, 2 & 3 to provide security to the
petitioners and they may be directed to ensure that
the respondent nos. 4 to 6 may not harass, threat and
commit violation to the petitioners in any manner.
(ii) Issue any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court
may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the
case, be passed in favour of the petitioners.
2
(iii) Cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the
petitioners."
2. The case of the petitioners is that they belong to
the same faith and caste. They are major. They got married
on 05.03.2023 at Shiv-Mandir, Laksar, District Haridwar
with their own sweet will. Their marriage was solemnized
without consent of the private respondent nos. 4 to 6.
3. As per the Certificate-Cum-Marksheets of High
School of petitioner nos.1 & 2, annexed to this writ petition,
they are major. Petitioners are present in-person before this
Court. Petitioners have apprised this Court that they have
threat perception at the hands of the private respondent
nos.4 to 6, who are grandfather and real brothers of the
petitioner no.1 respectively.
4. According to the petitioners, they have submitted
a representation dated 11.04.2023 before the Senior
Superintendent of Police, Haridwar, seeking adequate safety
and security for the petitioners, but no action has been
taken by the police for protecting their lives. Having been
left with no other remedy, petitioners have filed the present
writ petition.
5. Petitioners are major. Merely, because the family
members of petitioner no.1 are not agree with the marriage
of the petitioners, it does not permit them to take the law in
their own hands.
3
6. We hereby dispose of the writ petition by
directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar,
respondent No. 2, to take a decision on the representation
of the petitioners within 30 days from today. The Senior
Superintendent of Police, District Haridwar shall take
information and intelligence from the concerned Station
House Officer during the course of action whether police
protection is required or not. In the interregnum, Officer-in-
charge of Police Station Civil Line Roorkee, District
Haridwar, shall provide necessary police protection for
protecting the lives and liberty of the petitioners.
7. Interim Relief Application (IA No. 01 of 2023) also
stands disposed of.
8. Urgent copy of this order be supplied to the
learned counsel for the parties, during the course of the
day, as per Rules.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
___________________
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dated: 12.04.2023 JKJ/Pant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!