Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Through: Shri Navneet Kaushik vs Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna
2022 Latest Caselaw 2855 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2855 UK
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
Through: Shri Navneet Kaushik vs Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna on 8 September, 2022
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
             AT NAINITAL
                  Writ Petition (MS) No. 642 of 2022

Shakuntala Devi Lok Kalyan Samiti
and another.                                     ................Petitioners.

                               Through: Shri Navneet Kaushik, learned
                               counsel for the petitioner.


                        -Versus-
Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna
University and another.                            .........Respondents.
                               Through: Shri Dr. K.H. Gupta, learned counsel
                               the respondent no. 1 - University.

                               Shri Yogesh Pacholia, learned counsel for the
                               respondent no. 2 - NCTE.


            Date of hearing and judgment : 08.09.2022

Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.

1. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:

"i. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the letter dated 25.03.2022 and 07.02.2022 passed by respondent no. 1 by which affiliation / permission for intake of students has been granted to the petitioner's institute in respect of B.Ed Course for the academic year 2021-22 (academic session 2021 - 23) for 50 seats although NCTE i.e. respondent no. 2 has permitted the petitioner's institute to have an intake of 100 seats for B. Ed. Course.

ii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to permit the petitioner's institute to take 100 students as intake for

academic session 2021 -23 which is to be completed by 08th April, 2022."

2. There is no dispute that petitioners are imparting education for "Bachelor of Education Programme" and at present, students are studying in the petitioners' institute. The said petitioners were granted permission to conduct B.Ed. Programme for two years on 29.05.2015, vide Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition by the National Council for Teacher Education. For proper appreciation, relevant paragraph no. 5 of order dated 29.05.2015 is quoted below:

"5. Now, therefore, in the light of the above, the Northern Regional Committee, NCTE hereby issues the revised recognition order to Shakuntla Devi Educational Institute, Raipur Road, District Dehradun, State Uttarakhand for conducting B.Ed. programme of two years duration with annual intake of 100 for two basic units of 50 students each from the academic session 2015-16 subject to fulfillment of the condition mentioned herein before 31.10.2015."

3. However, respondent no. 1 - the University did not allow the petitioners to impart education to 100 students annually and has reduced the number of students to 50. Hence, this writ petition.

4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 - NCTE would submit that permission, granted as per Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition, has not been revoked by the NCTE and as yet, it is a binding permission. Moreover, if the Apex Body has granted permission for two years and there is no subsequent order for revoking the same, then there is presumption of continuation of

such permission, otherwise the future of the students would be adversely affected.

5. It is brought to the notice of this Court that sub-Section 6 of Section 14 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 provides for grant of affiliation to educational institutions by examining body on receipt of order under sub-Section 4 either for granting or refusing recognition to Institution by the Apex Body. Therefore, it is further held that once, the Apex Body has granted permission, then it is not within the competence or jurisdiction of the University to change the terms and conditions of such permission.

6. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed. A writ of Certiorari is issued. Impugned orders dated 25.03.2022 and 07.02.2022 passed by respondent no. 1 are hereby quashed. Respondent no. 1 is directed to allow the petitioners institute to take 100 students in B.Ed course for the academic year 2021-22 (academic session 2021 -2023) and also allow the students to appear in the examination scheduled to be held on 15.09.2022.

(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.)

SKS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter