Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3460 UK
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI
31ST OCTOBER, 2022
WRIT PETITON (S/B) No. 256 OF 2021
Between:
Ramesh Kumar.
...Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand and another.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, the learned
counsel.
Counsel for the respondents. : Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
The petitioner falls within the definition of a
public servant. The reliefs sought in the Writ Petition
squarely falls for consideration by the Uttarakhand Public
Services Tribunal.
2. Considering the fact that the Writ Petition has
been pending since 2021, and pleadings have been
exchanged, we direct the Registry to transfer the
complete record of this Writ Petition to the Uttarakhand
Public Services Tribunal, Nainital Bench. The Tribunal
shall register the same as a Claim Petition, and deal with
the same accordingly.
3. The Writ Petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
4. In sequel thereto, pending application, if any,
also stands disposed of.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
____________________
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
Dt: 31st October, 2022 Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!