Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3453 UK
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE
WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 141 OF 2021
21st OCTOBER, 2022
Between:
Govind Rawat and others ...... Petitioners
and
State of Uttarakhand & others ...... Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 402 OF 2021
Between:
Ajay Kumar and another ...... Petitioners
and
State of Uttarakhand & others ...... Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (S/S) NO. 502 OF 2021
Between:
Tenji Khampa and others ...... Petitioners
and
State of Uttarakhand & others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Mehta, Mr. Devendra
Singh Bohra and Mr. Ganesh
Kandpal, learned counsels
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Chief
Standing Counsel assisted by Mr.
2
Vikas Pande, learned Standing
Counsel and Mr. Gajendra Kumar
Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for
the State
: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Kaparuwan,
learned counsel for Uttarakhand
Board of Technical Education
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)
In the light of the order passed in Writ Petition
(S/B) No. 103 of 2021, these petitions have become
infructuous.
2) The petitions are, accordingly, disposed of as
infructuous.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
___________
R.C. KHULBE, J.
Dt: 21st OCTOBER, 2022 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!