Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3374 UK
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2022
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
C-482 No. 1882 of 2022
With
C-482 No. 1885 of 2022
Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. T.C. Aggarwal, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Ms. Lata Negi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, Advocate for private respondents.
These two C-482 applications are emanating from the Criminal Case No. 270 of 2022 "State Vs. Dev Singh and others", whereby the applicants to the C-482 applications, are being noticed to be tried for the offences under Sections 366, 354, 354-D & 120-B of I.P.C., which is presently pending consideration before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chamoli, District Chamoli.
As per the set of allegations levelled in the F.I.R., which was got registered on 24.04.2022, by the Uncle of respondent no.3, the alleged victim, there are certain set of allegations have been levelled allegedly for involvement of the present applicants for commission of the offences under Sections 366, 354, 354-D & 120-B of I.P.C.
The C-482 applications referred to herein are being sought to be compounded, on the ground that the cognizance, which has been taken after submission of the charge-sheet being Charge-Sheet No. 2 of 2022, dated 04.07.2022, by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chamoli, District Chamoli, the same deserves to be quashed owing to the so called theory of settlement, referred to in the compounding application.
The compounding applications are vehemently opposed by the learned Government Advocate contending thereof that the offences, under Sections 366 and 354-D of I.P.C. would not be compoundable offences.
Infect this Court is of the view that if the facts, which has been brought on record by way of the whatsapp messages, which the victim was sharing with the applicant to the C-482 Application No. 1882 of 2022, and particularly owing to the fact, referred to in the F.I.R. that the respondent no.3-victim was found voluntarily travelling in the Car, along with the applicant, that itself dilutes the impact of Sections 366, 354 & 354-D of I.P.C., because it would not be a forceful act, but rather a voluntary act, at the behest of the victim-respondent no.3 herein, because its not the case of the prosecution or the complainant, that she was taken in the Car, against her wishes, because as per the narration of the F.I.R. itself, it does not reflect that there was any alarm, which was ever raised by the victim-respondent no.3, at the time, when she was being taken in the Car by the other inmates and the present applicants, rather to the contrary, the victim- respondent no.3 was found to be travelling in the car along with Daulat Singh S/o Madan Singh and along with other inmates.
In that eventuality, the offences under Sections 366 & 354-D of I.P.C., cannot be apparently said to have been made out against the present applicant, who is presently languishing in jail because of a wrongful act of the registration of the F.I.R. by the victim-respondent no.3, who was apparently in intimate relationship with the present applicant.
Owing to the aforesaid fact, coupled with the fact, which has been referred to in the compounding application, that since the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court, and which stands fortified by the signatures of the complainants, namely, Bharat Singh and Dharam Singh, this Court is of the view, that in order to safeguard the career of the present applicant, which has been spoiled, on the basis of a wrongful complaint registered by respondent no.3, the dispute deserves to be resolved by exercising inherent powers under Sections 482 Cr.P.C., in the light of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of judgments, which have already been dealt with the aspect of compounding of offences, which are not included under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when the Courts, while exercising its inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India could be compounded by the High Court, depending upon the circumstances of the case.
Since, the parties to the proceedings have now resolved their dispute, and they do not intend to prosecute the present applicants any further, the C-482 applications are hereby allowed, as a consequence thereto the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 270 of 2022 "State Vs. Dev Singh and others", which is presently pending consideration before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chamoli, District Chamoli, would hereby stand quashed and the applicants herein will stand exonerated of the set of allegations, which is levelled in the F.I.R., registered by respondent no.3.
Subjects to the aforesaid, both the C- 482 applications stand allowed.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 18.10.2022 Mamta
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!