Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 771 UK
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.
AND
SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE, J.
14TH MARCH, 2022
WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 105 OF 2022
Between:
Shyam Sundar Yadav.
...Petitioner and
State of Uttarakhand and others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. S.S. Yadav, the learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents. : Mr. Pradeep Joshi, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following
JUDGMENT : (per Sri S.K. Mishra, A.C.J.)
The petitioner is a public servant. Therefore,
he has an alternative and efficacious remedy of
approaching the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
2. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed to be
withdrawn, with a liberty to the petitioner to approach
the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
3. In sequel thereto, all pending applications also
stand disposed of.
4. Urgent copy of this order be supplied to the
learned counsel for the parties, as per Rules.
________________ S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.
_____________ R.C. KHULBE, J.
Dt: 14th March, 2022 Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!