Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 637 UK
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.
AND
SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
08TH MARCH, 2022
WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 841 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
Teena & another .....Petitioners. And
State of Uttarakhand & others ....Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioners : None appears.
Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.K. Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following
JUDGMENT :(per Sri S.K. Mishra, A.C.J.)
None appears for the petitioners.
2. Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy Advocate General
appearing for the State does not have instructions in the
matter.
3. Since almost ten months have elapsed, in the
meantime, threat perception might have changed. So, we
dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners if
the petitioners face any further problem and the cause of
action persists in the shape of threat to their lives and
property, they are at liberty to file an application for
modification/recall of this order.
(S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.)
(ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.) Dated: 08TH March, 2022 NISHANT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!