Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 400 UK
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.
AND
SRI JUSTICE N.S. DHANIK, J.
WRIT PETITION ( PIL) NO. 158 OF 2016
23RD FEBRUARY, 2022
BETWEEN:
Chandra Shekhar Kargeti .....Petitioner. And
State of Uttarakhand & others ....Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. M.C. Pande, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, learned Brief Holder for the State.
: Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following
JUDGMENT: (per SRI S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.)
Mr. M.C. Pant, the learned counsel for the
petitioner, wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with
liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
2. Therefore, the writ petition is, hereby, dismissed as
withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh
petition with better particulars.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo to that effect. The same shall be kept on record.
(S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.)
(N.S. DHANIK, J.) Dated: 23rd February, 2022 NISHANT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!