CLCON/379/2017
2021 Latest Caselaw 3538 UK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                   AT NAINITAL
     ON THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
                           BEFORE:
 HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
     CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2017

BETWEEN:

Prakash Chandrs Joshi                  ... Petitioner

     (By Mr. T.C. Pandey, Advocate)

AND:
S. Ramaswamy & others                  ... Opposite Parties
     (By Mr. J.S. Bisht, Advocate)

                      JUDGMENT

1. Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the opposite parties submits that the order dated 11.05.2017 passed by Writ Court in WPSS No. 1969 of 2011 has been substantially complied with and services of all the petitioners have now been regularized, except petitioner no. 6.

2. Regarding petitioner no. 6, Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties has informed the Court that since petitioner, as a daily wager, was engaged only w.e.f. 01.04.1994, while cut-off-date is 29.06.1991, therefore, his claim for regularization was considered and rejected.

3. Since, all the petitioners have been regularized, except petitioner no. 6 as his case is not covered by the applicable regularization Rules and Mr. T.C. Pande, learned counsel for the petitioners also does not dispute the submission made on behalf of

the opposite parties that all other petitioners have been regularized, except petitioner no. 6, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this contempt petition pending.

4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed by recording the statement made by Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties on record. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.

(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.) Aswal