Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4764 UK
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH
CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.S. DHANIK
FIRST APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2020
25TH NOVEMBER, 2021
Between:
Meghmala ...Appellant.
and
Jitendra Mohan ...Respondent
Counsel for the appellant :None is present.
Counsel for the respondent: Mr. Shikhar Kacker,
learned counsel.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT : (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
In the order dated 29.10.2021, this Court
had clearly observed that "despite the service of notice
informing her that her counsel Mr. Sudhir Kumar had
pleaded no instructions, and in spite of this Court
giving her four weeks' time to engage the services of a
counsel of her choice, neither the appellant, nor a
counsel of her choice, appears before this Court
today."
2. In the interest of justice, this Court had
also informed the appellant that in case either the
1
appellant, or her counsel does not appear before this
Court on the next date, this Court shall have no other
option but to dismiss the case for non-prosecution.
3. According to the report of the Registry
dated 30.10.2021, the said information, i.e. a copy of
the order dated 29.10.2021 was duly sent to the
appellant. Despite the information being sent, today
neither the appellant, nor a counsel of her choice is
present before this Court.
4. Therefore, this first appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
5. In sequel thereto, pending application, if
any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
6. No order as to costs.
_____________________________
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.
___________________
N.S. Dhanik, J.
Dt: 25th November, 2021 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!