Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4620 UK
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 383 OF 2021
17TH NOVEMBER, 2021
Between:
M/S Jai Bhawani Stone Crusher.
...Appellant
and
State of Uttarakhand and others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, the learned
Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Pankaj
Chaturvedi, the learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondent nos. 1, : Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, the learned Brief
3 and 4. Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Counsel for the respondent no. 2. : Mr. Alok Kumar, the learned counsel
holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari,
the learned counsel.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT : (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
The appellant has challenged the legality of
the order dated 25.10.2021, passed by a learned Single
Judge in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2174 of 2021, whereby
the learned Single Judge has passed a conditional stay
order while imposing a condition that in case the
appellant were to deposit a sum of Rupees One Crore
with the Registry of this Court within two weeks from
the date of the order, the recovery pursuant to the
order dated 28.09.2021 shall remain stayed.
2. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, the learned Senior
Counsel for the appellant, submits that the appellant is,
indeed, willing to deposit the said amount, but only
through a bank guarantee. For, the appellant does not
have such a large sum of Rupees One Crore available
with him. However, the appellant is willing to deposit
the said amount through a bank guarantee. Moreover,
since three weeks' time would be required to submit
the bank guarantee, the learned Senior Counsel prays
that the two weeks' time granted by the learned Single
Judge should be extended, and three weeks' time
should be granted by this Court for the appellant to
submit the bank guarantee.
3. Therefore, this Court modifies the order
dated 25.10.2021, and directs the appellant to deposit
a sum of Rupees One Crore through a bank guarantee
within a period of three weeks from today. If the said
2
bank guarantee is, indeed, submitted before the
Registry of this Court within the stipulated period, then
the operation of the impugned order dated 28.09.2021
shall remain stayed during the pendency of the Writ
Petition.
4. With these modifications, this Special Appeal
stands disposed of.
5. No order as to costs.
_____________________________
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.
___________________
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 17th November, 2021 Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!