Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPMS/2204/2021
2021 Latest Caselaw 4552 UK

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4552 UK
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2021

Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2204/2021 on 12 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                   AT NAINITAL
     ON THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
                          BEFORE:
 HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI


     WRIT PETITION (M/S) No. 2204 of 2021

BETWEEN:

M/s Om Seeds Pvt. Ltd. and others.                  ...Petitioners
     (By Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate)

AND:
District Magistrate/Collector,
District Udham Singh Nagar others. ...Respondents
     (By   Mr.   Devesh    Ghildiyal,     Brief   Holder   for   the
     State/respondent     no.   1   and   Ms.     Prabha   Naithani,
     Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3)


                        JUDGMENT

Petitioners took a loan from Union Bank of India, Branch Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Petitioners are aggrieved by e-auction notice dated 18.09.2021 issued by Authorized Officer of the bank, whereby the immovable secured asset mortgaged with the bank, has been offered for sale through e-auction to be held on 22.10.2021.

2. Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel appearing for the Bank has apprised the Court that on the date fixed for e-auction, not a single offer was received, and now a fresh e-auction notice would be published for e-auction of the secured assets.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners had approached Debts Recovery Tribunal against the demand notice and possession

notice issued by the Bank in exercise of powers under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. He, however, points out that since the term of Presiding Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun has expired and new incumbent has not been appointed, therefore, no order could be passed on petitioners' securitization application.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are ready & willing to enter into one time settlement of the loan with the Bank. He, therefore, submits that petitioners may be permitted to submit a proposal for one time settlement of the loan and the Competent Authority in the Bank be directed to consider petitioners' proposal.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank assures the Court that if petitioners submit proposal for one time settlement, the Competent Authority in the Bank shall consider the same and take appropriate decision at the earliest.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to submit a proposal for one time settlement before the Competent Authority in the Bank. If petitioners submit such proposal within ten days from today, the Competent Authority in the Bank shall consider petitioners' proposal and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law, within four weeks thereafter.

7. Let a certified copy of this order be issued today itself.

(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.) Navin

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter