Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPMS/1224/2021
2021 Latest Caselaw 2155 UK

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2155 UK
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2021

Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/1224/2021 on 30 June, 2021
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
              AT NAINITAL
              ON THE 30th DAY OF JUNE, 2021

                              BEFORE:

     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI


           Writ Petition (M/S) No.1224 of 2021

BETWEEN:
  Ramvraksh Sahani                                    .....Petitioner
       (Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate)

AND:

     State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
                                                   .....Respondents

       (Mr. T.S. Phartiyal, Addl. C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand and
       Mr. Gopal K. Verma, Standing Counsel for State of U.P.)


                            JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner was allotted a piece of land by Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Bareilly for developing a nursery. Said allotment is valid upto 30.06.2021, as is apparent from perusal of the order dated 30.05.2018, which is Annexure-4 to the writ petition.

3. Petitioner has challenged auction notice issued by Assistant Engineer, 2nd Sub-Division, Nanaksagar, Udham Singh Nagar, whereby bids were invited for allotment of the land situate on the

eastern side of the Nanaksagar Dam in Village Jungle Jogither, for developing a nursery.

4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the description of the land is not properly given and the auction notice is absolutely vague, therefore, it deserves to be quashed.

5. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State of U.P./respondent nos.4, 5 and 6 submits that there is no infirmity in the impugned auction notice. He further submits that as per the auction notice, auction was to be held on 09.06.2021; therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.

6. Without going into the merits of the case, this Court thinks that ends of justice would be met if petitioner is permitted to approach the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Bareilly, by making a representation for ventilation of his grievance. If such representation is made within 10 days from today, the Executive Engineer shall consider the same and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, within six weeks thereafter.

7. Subject to the above, writ petition stands disposed of finally.

(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.) Rajni

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter