Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2409 UK
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
ON THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE:
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ K. TIWARI
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1051 of 2018
BETWEEN:
Dr. Suman ... Petitioner
(By Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate)
AND:
State of Uttarakhand & others ... Respondents
(By Mr. T.S. Phartiyal, Additional C.S.C. and Mr.
Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate appearing for
respondent nos. 3 & 4, Mr. Susheel Kumar, Advocate
holding brief of Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel
for respondent and Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for
respondent no. 4.)
With
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1052 of 2018
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1053 of 2018
JUDGMENT
1. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and are being heard & decided together. However, for the sake of convenience, facts of WPMS No. 1051 of 2018 are being considered.
2. Petitioner was desirous of pursuing Post Graduate Medical Course from Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Science during Academic Session 2018-19. Since the concerned college was demanding more fee from the petitioner, therefore,
petitioner filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to extend the Last date of admission against PG seat for OBG/(Gynecologist) under state quota/UR/women category.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to forthwith grant admission to the petitioner against PG seat for OBG/(Gynecologist) under state quota/UR/women category with the prescribed fees Rupees 7,38,835/- (Tuition Fee) deposited by petitioner, as has been fixed by the Fee Regulatory Committee, and respondent no. 3 may further be directed to strictly adhere to the provisions laid down in the Uttrakhand Unaided Private Professional Education Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) (Amendment) Act, 2010.
3. This Court on 13.04.2018 had passed following order:-
"Petitioners participated in NEET P.G. 2018 for admission to P.G. Medical Courses. Based on the ranking in the merit list for Uttarakhand State, they were allotted seat in different P.G. Courses in Sri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences in the State counseling. Grievance of the petitioners is that despite depositing the entire fee, as fixed by the State Government, Sri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences is requiring the petitioners to deposit fee over and above the fee determined by the State Government.
Sri Subhang Dobhal, Advocate submits that the Fee Determination Committee constituted under Sri Guru Ram Rai University Act, 2016 has already determined the fee for P.G. Medical Courses, therefore, the University is rightly demanding the fee in terms of the said determination by the Committee. He further submits that the matter is sub judice before this Court in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 933 of 2018.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 prays for and is granted three weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioners may file rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter.
In the meantime, it is provided that the University shall give admission to the petitioners by tomorrow, subject to petitioners submitting separate undertaking with the University that the petitioners will abide by the outcome of Writ Petition (M/S) No. 933 of 2018.
Mr. Subhang Dobhal, Advocate undertakes to communicate this order to the University today itself.
Let a certified copy of this order be supplied to learned counsel for the parties today itself on payment of usual charges."
4. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, learned Senior counsel appearing for the Institute submits that pursuant to the interim order, petitioner was given admission in the Institute and she has deposited the fee, as determined by Fee Regulatory Committee constituted under Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006. He further submits that now the writ petitions have become infructuous, as in terms of the interim order, petitioners have given undertaking that they will abide by the outcome of WPMS No. 933 of 2018, in which question involved is whether Shri Guru Ram Rai University Act, 2016 would prevail or Uttarakhand Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 would be applicable for determining the fee.
5. Mr. D.K. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the submission made by Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate appearing for the College and he concedes that in view of the undertaking
given by petitioners in terms of order dated 13.04.2018, they shall be bound by the outcome of WPMS No. 933 of 2018.
6. From the aforesaid discussion, it is apparent that no useful purpose would be served by keeping these writ petitions pending on the file. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. However, it is made clear that petitioners shall be liable to pay the excess fee, if any, as per their undertaking and/or the judgment to be rendered in WPMS No. 933 of 2018.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) Aswal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!