Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 399 UK
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
ON THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE:
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 3120 of 2018
BETWEEN:
Ashok Chaudhary. ....Petitioner
(By Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate)
AND:
Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others.
.....Respondents
(By Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate)
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is an employee of Uttarakhand Transport Corporation. By means of this writ petition, he has sought following relief:
"i) Issue a writ, rule or direction in nature of certiorarified mandamus quashing the effect and operation of the impugned orders dated 07.10.2017, 22.07.2017 and 31.10.2017 (as contained annexure no. 1 (colly) to this writ petition) after calling the entire record from the respondents and to direct the respondents to release the all service benefits including pay and arrears to the petitioner, had it been the impugned orders were inexistence and also to refix his pay with all increments and consequential benefits along with interest @ 18%, keeping in view the facts highlighted in the bod of the writ petition."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the Competent Authority has now passed a subsequent order against the petitioner.
3. In view of the subsequent development, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition for composite relief.
4. Permission is granted.
5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.) Arpan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!