Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3169 UK
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
ON THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE:
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
CONTEMPT PETITION No. 347 of 2017
BETWEEN:
Surendra Singh Chaudhary. ...Petitioner
(There is no representation for the petitioner)
AND:
D.Senthil Pandian & another. ...Respondents
(By Mr. H.M. Raturi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.
Pradeep Hariya and Mr. J.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for
the State of Uttarakhand)
JUDGMENT
Writ Court had decided petitioner's writ petition vide order dated 27.03.2017. Subsequently, on his review application, judgment dated 27.03.2017 was modified and respondents were directed to pay interest on delayed payment of gratuity, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks.
2. Alleging disobedience of the said order, petitioner has filed this Contempt Petition.
3. A compliance affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. In paragraph no. 3 of the compliance affidavit, it has been stated that a sum of ` 12,312/- as interest on delayed payment of gratuity has been paid to the petitioner through demand draft dated 11.09.2017.
4. In such view of the matter, the Contempt Petition is closed.
5. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.
(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.) Arpan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!