Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1723 Tri
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2026
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
I.A. No.01 of 2026
In WP(C) No.516 of 2025
Smt. Biva Thapa
.....Writ Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tripura and Others
......Respondent(s)
AND In the matter of:
Tripura State Electricity Corporation Limited, (To be represented by the Managing Director, Tripura State Electricity Corporation Limited), Bidyut Bhavan, Banamalipur, P.S- East Agartala, Agartala, District- West Tripura.
......Applicant(s).
For Applicant(s) : Mr. Dhrubajyoti Saha, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Purusuttam Roy Barman, Senior Advocate.
Ms. Aradhita Debbarma, Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Order
19/03/2026
Heard learned counsel of both sides.
Mr. Dhrubajyoti Saha, learned counsel for TSECL, submits that time was consumed for collection of records and verification thereof and also for obtaining necessary instructions from the concerned higher authorities, and therefore the counter-affidavit could not be submitted earlier.
Mr. Saha, learned counsel further submits that the delay in filing the counter-affidavit was completely unintentional, and therefore, the order for payment of cost may be modified.
As it appears from the record, sufficient scope was earlier given to the TSECL to submit counter-affidavit. They first entered their appearance on 09.09.2025. Despite the same, they could not submit the counter-affidavit
in time. Considering thus, the prayer for relaxation of cost does not generate much satisfaction and the same is accordingly rejected.
Interlocutory application is, accordingly, disposed of.
JUDGE
SUJAY Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH
GHOSH 12:25:36 +05'30' Date: 2026.03.20
Dinashree
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!