Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2543 Tri
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2026
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C) No.303 of 2025
Sri Dhananjoy Debbarma,
S/o: Late Khirod Debbarma,
Resident of Colonel Bari, near Tribal Collage Hostel,
Krishnanagar, P.O.: Agartala, P.S.: West Agartala,
District: West Tripura, PIN: 799001.
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Tripura, represented by the Secretary, PWD
Department, Govt. of Tripura, New Secretariat Building, P.S.: NCC,
P.O.: Secretariat, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN: 799010.
2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Tripura, New
Secretariat Building, P.S.: NCC, P.O.: Secretariat, Agartala, West
Tripura, PIN: 799010.
3. The Chief Engineer, PWD (R & B) Department, Govt. of Tripura,
New Secretariat Building, P.S.: NCC, P.O.: Secretariat, Agartala, West
Tripura, PIN: 799010.
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous
District Council (TTAADC), Administrative Building, Khumulwng, P.O. &
P.S.: Radhapur, West Tripura.
----Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aradhita Debbarma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Karnajit De, Addl. GA Mr. Bhaskar Debbarma, Adv.
Date of hearing : 07.04.2026
Date of delivery
of Judgment & Order : 13.04.2026
Whether fit for
reporting : YES
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Judgment & Order
Heard Learned Counsel, Ms. Aradhita Debbarma appearing
on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Learned Addl. GA, Mr. Karnajit
De appearing on behalf of the respondents-State and Learned Counsel,
Mr. Bhaskar Debbarma appearing on behalf of the respondent-
TTAADC.
2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the
following reliefs:
"(i) Issue rule calling upon the respondent to show cause as to why a writ of Certiorari or like nature, shall not be issued for setting aside the impugned communication letter No.F.2(10)/-PWD(GE)/76(Pt-
38)/8804 dated 10th September, 2024 (Annexure-
11);
AND
(ii) Issue rule calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ of mandamus or like nature, shall not be issued directing the respondents to count Past Service of the petitioner from the date of his joining i.e., from 17th March, 1998 as Junior Engineer (Grade-I Civil) under TTAADC to join as Junior Engineer (Civil) (Grade-V of TES), Group-B under the State service for the purpose of pay protection, pension and other retiral benefits;
AND
(iii) To issue any other writ or directions so as to grant complete and adequate relief to the petitioner;
AND
(iv) To pass any other order/orders as Your Honour may think fit and proper for fair ends of justice;
AND For this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall every pray."
3. At the time of hearing, Learned Counsel for the petitioner
drawn the attention of this Court that on 17.03.1998, the petitioner
initially joined in service as a Junior Engineer (Grade-I Civil) under
Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (for short, TTAADC).
The petitioner, thereafter, applied for "No Objection Certificate" (for
short, NOC) for appearing in the TPSC Examination (Annexure-1 to the
writ petition). Accordingly, the respondent-TTAADC vide office order
dated 18.08.1999 issued NOC in his favour for appearing in the TPSC
Examination. The TPSC published an advertisement dated 01.07.2002
wherein there were 3(three) posts for Civil Engineers and in the
instruction portion of the advertisement it was specifically mentioned
that "the candidates who get employed after submission of application
will have to produce „No-objection‟ certificate from the employers at
the time of interview otherwise they will not be interviewed". The
petitioner qualified the examination conducted by the TPSC and after
that vide office order dated 27.11.2003 (Annexure-3 to the writ
petition) the present petitioner along with others were appointed to
the post of Junior Engineer (Civil Degree Holder) TES Grade-V(A) by
the PWD, Govt. of Tripura. In the said office order, in column No.II it
was specifically mentioned as follows:
"II. These persons (mentioned in I above) are not entitled to pay protection, but the benefit of their past service for the purpose of pension is admissible as per Govt. Rules."
It was further submitted by Learned Counsel for the
petitioner that the petitioner approached to the authority of the PWD
for counting his past service (Annexure-4 to the writ petition). In
reply, the authority of the PWD, by a communication dated 14.06.2023
sought some clarification (Annexure-5 to the writ petition). Thereafter,
on 17.06.2023, the petitioner sent one communication to the Chief
Executive Officer, TTAADC, Khumulwng forwarding the letter of Chief
Engineer, PWD (R & B) seeking some clarification in respect of
counting of his past service (Annexure 6 to the writ petition). The
Executive Engineer, TTAADC, Khumulwng by letter dated 06.07.2023
forwarded the relevant documents of the petitioner.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that
the Addl. Chief Executive Engineer, TTAADC, Khumulwng by a
certificate dated 03.07.2023 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition)
specifically mentioned that the petitioner continued his service as
Junior Engineer, (Grade-I Civil) and he would have been eligible for
confirmation in his service in the post of Grade-I (Civil) in the PWD (R
& B), TTAADC since 17.03.1998 to 11.12.2003. After that, the Deputy
Secretary, PWD by a communication dated 18.09.2023 further sought
clarification from the TTAADC (Annexure-9 to the writ petition) and in
reply to that the Addl. Chief Executive Officer by a communication
dated 27.09.2023 confirmed the Deputy Secretary, PWD that the
Service Confirmation Certificate issued by the TTAADC was genuine.
Thereafter, by another communication dated 27.12.2023, the Addl.
Chief Executive Officer, TTAADC, Khumulwng had sent another
communication to the Deputy Secretary, PWD regarding service
confirmation of the petitioner and by communication dated 14.05.2024
(Annexure-10 to the writ petition) it was informed by Addl. Chief
Executive Officer, TTAADC, Khumulwng to Deputy Secretary, PWD that
the TTAADC is the administrative department for awarding pensionary
benefits to its own employees since 1996. Finally, the Deputy
Secretary, PWD by a communication dated 10.09.2024 (Annexure-11
to the writ petition), most arbitrarily informed the petitioner that his
proposal for counting of past service has been regretted by the Finance
Department, which compelled the petitioner to file the present writ
petition.
It was further submitted by Learned Counsel for the
petitioner that the Department has considered counting of past
services of similarly situated employees namely, Smt. Gouri Rani
Barman, TES, Grade-IV(Civil) (Annexure-12 to the writ petition) and
Shri Prabal Das, TES, Grade-III(Civil) (Annexure-13 to the writ
petition) who were appointed by the same notification of the PWD.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that admittedly,
the petitioner did not submit any technical resignation in writing but,
the acceptance of his appointment and his release by the TTAADC
would amount to a technical resignation on his behalf, thereby
enabling the Department to count his past service. However, the
Department has arbitrarily refused his candidature without any cogent
grounds.
4. The respondents-State contested the case by filing written
counter affidavit. In para Nos.4 to 9 of the counter affidavit, they took
the following pleas:
4.That, the petitioner applied for the post of Junior Engineer (Civil), TES Grade-V(A) [Degree Holder] in the pay scale of Rs.7450-13,000/- in light of TSCS(RP) Rules, 1999 under Public Works Department, Government of Tripura against the TPSC Advertisement No. 5(A)/2002 dated 01/07/2002. Upon selection by the Tripura Public Service Commission, the Petitioner was offered to join Public Works Department, Government of Tripura in the post of Junior Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-V(A) [Degree holder] in the pay scale of Rs.7450-13,000/- in light of TSCS(RP) Rules, 1999 vide Office Order No.F.6(22)-
PWD(E)/2003 dated 27/11/2003 (Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition) subject to the following conditions that-
1. "The Persons who have been serving as Ex-
cadre, Jr. Engineer/Jr. Overseer are required to resign from their present post before joining the post to which now being appointed. No joining report will be accepted without release order.
2. These persons (mentioned in 1 above) are not entitled to pay protection, but the benefit of their past service for the purpose of pension is admissible as per Govt. Rules".
Further, it is pertinent to mention here that, prior to joining the Public Works Department the Petitioner by a letter dated 05/12/2003 asked the Competent Authority of T.T.A.A.D.C to release him from his present consignment to join as Junior Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-V(A) under Public Works Department. Accordingly, the Executive Officer (Admn.) T.T.A.A.D.C by a Release Order No.F.7- 4(573)/ADC/ESTT/96/18,285-300 dated 11/12/2003 released him from the control of T.T.A.A.D.C on 12/12/2003 (Afternoon) with a direction to join at new place of posting under the Public Works Department, Government of Tripura.
Copy of the letter dated 05/12/2003 of the is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure-R/3.
Copy of the Order No.F.7-4(573)/ADC/ESTT/96/18,285- 300 dated 11/12/2003 of the Executive Officer (Admn.) T.T.A.A.D.C is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure- R/4.
5. That, while switching over the service from the post of Junior Engineer, Grade-I under T.T.A.A.D.C to the post of Junior Engineer, TES Grade-V(A) [Degree Holder] under Public Works Department, Government of Tripura, the petitioner didn't tender 'TECHNICAL RESIGNATION' which is a prerequisite criteria to ensuring pay protection as well as counting of the past service for the pension & pensionary benefits as claimed by the petitioner. Because, as per the Ministry of Finance OM No.3379-E.III(B)/65
dated 17/06/1965, the Resignation is treated as a Technical formality where a Government servant has applied through proper channel for a post in the same or some other Department, and is on selection, required to resign from the previous post for administrative reasons.
It is pertinent to mention here that the Clause-I & Clause- II under Terms & Conditions mentioned against the Office Order No.F.6(22)-PWD(E)/2003 dated 27/11/2003 (Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition) shall not be applicable to the Petitioner as the Petitioner didn't serve as an Ex-Cadre Jr. Engineer/ Ex-Cadre Jr. Overseer under Public Works Department prior to joining PWD on selection through TPSC.
Thus from the above discussion it can be concluded that, neither the Petitioner tendered any Technical Resignation while switching over the service from the post of Junior Engineer, Grade-I under T.T.A.A.D.C to the post of Junior Engineer, TES Grade-V(A) [Degree Holder) under Public Works Department, Government of Tripura nor served as an Ex. Cadre Junior Engineer under PWD prior to joining the regular post of the Junior Engineer, Civil, TES Grade- V(A) under PWD on selection through TPSC for which question of ensuring pay protection as well as counting the past service for the purpose of pension & pensionary benefits doesn't arise.
6. That, with regard to para 8 and 9, I say that, Shri Prabal Das had joined PWD by an Office Order No.F.6(22)- PWD(E)/2003 dated 27/11/2003 (Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition) in the post of Junior Engineer, TES Grade-V(A), Civil upon getting selected through T.P.S.C. Accordingly, he joined PWD on 01/12/2003 being a Junior Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-V(A) & continued in the same post till 03/03/2014. Thereafter, Shri Prabal Das had applied through proper channel for the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV [Degree Holder], by Direct Recruitment through TPSC against the Advertisement No.12/2010. Upon getting selected by the TPSC for the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV [Degree Holder], Shri Prabal Das had tendered Resignation from the post of Junior Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-V(A) [Degree Holder] & thereafter he was offered to join in the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV [Degree Holder] vide Notification No.F.6(35)-PWD(GE)/2009(S) dated 17/02/2014.
It is pertinent to be mentioned here that, as per terms & condition laid down in Notification No.F.6(35)- PWD(GE)/2009(S) dated 17/02/2014, it is clearly mentioned at Para No. 2(ii) & (iii) that "The appointee shall have to submit discharge certificate and Employment Exchange Card (Both in Original). Employment Exchange Card, if already submitted to the present employer, a confirmation to that extent from the employer concern shall have to be furnished alongwith joining report.
All head of Offices are requested not to accept the joining report without production of above mentioned certificates
except Sl. No.-25 who have already submitted Employment Exchange Cards. The Discharge Certificate/ Employment Exchange Card in Original may be forwarded to the Office of the Chief Engineer PWD(R&B) immediately on receipt of the same from the appointees".
In the case Shri Prabal Das resigned from his earlier assignment i.e., Junior Engineer, (Civil), TES Grade-V(A) in the Public Works Department, Government of Tripura & accordingly he was discharged from the post of Junior Engineer, (Civil), TES Grade-V(A) & thereafter upon submission of discharge certificate (release order) he joined in the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade- IV [Degree Holder] on 04/03/2025 (forenoon) in Public Works Department, Government of Tripura.
Copy of the Notification No.F.6(35)-PWD(GE)/2009(S) dated 17/02/2014 is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure-R/5.
7. That, as per Rule 14 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 as adopted in the State of Tripura the Condition for qualifying Service is described as follows:-
"(1) The Service of a Government servant shall not qualify unless his duties and pay are regulated by the Government, or under conditions determined by the Government.
(2) For the purpose of sub-rule (1), the expression "service" means service under the Government and paid by that Government from the consolidated fund of the State of Tripura or a local Fund administered by the Government but does not include service in a non-pensionable establishment unless such service is treated a qualifying service by the Government of Tripura.
(3) In the case of Government servant belonging to Central Government or other State Government, who is permanently transferred to a service or post to which these rules apply, the continuous service rendered under the Central Government or the State Government in an officiating or temporary capacity, if any, followed without interruption by substantive appointment, or the continuous service rendered under that Government in an officiating or temporary capacity, as the case may be, shall qualify:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-rule shall apply to any such Government servant who is appointed otherwise that by deputation to a service or post to which these rules apply".
Further, as per Rule 15 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 as adopted in the State of Tripura it is stated that Service on probation against a post if followed by confirmation in the same or another post shall qualify.
Further, as per Office Memorandum No.F.12(1)-GA/83 dated 21/08/1989, the Government of Tripura has adopted the procedure for service confirmation,
promotion, seniority, lien etc. for the employees of the State Government of Tripura as outlined in the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel Grievances and Pension circulated vide Office Memorandum No. 18011/1/86-Estt(D) 28/03/1988. And, according to above Memo. General Condition of Service confirmation is stated as below:-
(I) Confirmation will be made only once in the service of an official which will be in the entry grade.
(II) Confirmation is delinked from the availability of permanent vacancy in the grade. In other words, an officer who has successfully completed the probation may be considered for confirmation.
8. That, Shri Prabal Das has successfully completed the probationary period of service in the entry grade i.e., TES Grade-V(A). Upon completion of probation period Shri Prabal Das, Executive Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-III, [Degree Holder] become eligible for confirmation of service which was rendered by him in the post of Junior Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-V(A), [Degree Holder] in the Public Works Department w.e.f 01/12/2003(forenoon) after taking concurrence from the Government. Thereafter, Department vide Notification No.F.2(10)-PWD(E)/76(Pt-
28)/16912-17 dated 30/01/2024 (Annexure-13 to the Writ Petition) counted the past service of Shri Prabal Das, Executive Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-III, [Degree Holder] w.e.f 01/12/2003 to 03/03/2014 for the purpose of pension & pensionary benefit.
On the other hand, one Smt. Gouri Rani Barman, Junior Engineer, Grade-I (Civil) who was working in the Agriculture Department, Government of Tripura applied through proper channel for the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil,TES Grade-IV [Degree Holder], by Direct Recruitment through TPSC against the Advertisement No.12/2010. Upon selected by the TPSC for the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV[Degree Holder], Smt. Gouri Rani Barman had applied for Discharge Certificate on 12/08/2008 from her the then employer i.e., the Director, Agriculture Department, Government of Tripura from the post of Junior Engineer, Grade-I, Civil & thereafter she was offered to join in the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV [Degree Holder] by Notification No.F.6(35)- PWD(E)/92 dated 10/12/2008. She joined in the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV [Degree Holder] on 31/12/2008 (forenoon).
9. That, as per terms & condition laid down in the Notification No.F.6(35)-PWD(E)/92 dated 10/12/2008, it is clearly mentioned at Para No. 2(i) & 3 that "The appointee shall have to submit discharge certificate and Employment Exchange Card, if already submitted to the present employer, a confirmation to that extent from the employer concern shall have to be furnished along with joining report.
All head of Offices are requested not to accept the joining report without production of above mentioned certificates except Sl. 6, 17, 28 & 30 those who have already submitted Employment Exchange Cards. The discharge certificate/ Employment Exchange Card in Original may be forwarded to the Office of the Chief Engineer PWD(R&B) immediately on receipt of the same from the appointees".
As per the above notification Smt. Gouri Rani Barman, resigned from her earlier assignment i.e.. Junior Engineer, Grade-I (Civil) in the Agriculture Department, Government of Tripura & accordingly she was discharged from the post of Junior Engineer, Grade-I (Civil) & thereafter upon submission of discharge certificate (release order) she joined in the post of Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade- IV [Degree Holder] on 31/12/2008 (forenoon) in Public Works Department, Government of Tripura.
It is further submitted that, Smt. Gouri Rani Barman joined on 01/02/2005 in the Agriculture Department, Government of Tripura in the post of Junior Engineer, Grade-I (Civil). Smt. Gouri Rani Barman has successfully completed the probationary period of service in the entry grade i.e., Junior Engineer, Grade-I, Civil. Upon completion of probation period Smt. Gouri Rani Barman, Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV, [Degree Holder] become eligible for confirmation of service which was rendered by she in the post of Junior Engineer, Grade-I, Civil, in the Agriculture Department w.e.f 01/12/2003(forenoon) after taking concurrence from the Government. Thereafter, Department by Notification No.F.2(10)-PWD(E)/76(P-8) dated 21/07/2011 (Annexure-12 to the Writ Petition) counted the past service of Smt. Gouri Rani Barman, Assistant Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-IV, [Degree Holder] w.e.f 01/02/2005 to 30/12/2008 for the purpose of pension & pensionary benefit.
But, on the other hand the Petitioner, while switching over the service from the post of Junior Engineer, Grade-I under T.T.A.A.D.C to the post of Junior Engineer, TES Grade-V(A) [Degree Holder] under Public Works Department, Government of Tripura, neither the tendered Technical Resignation nor he was discharged by the Competent Authority of T.T.A.A.D.C. But, the Petitioner was released from his earlier assignment i.e., Junior Engineer, Grade-I by the Competent Authority of T.T.A.A.D.C on 12/12/2003.
The aforesaid statement is also revealed from the letter No.F.2(9)/ADC/Estt/ 2023 (shadow) dated 9th July, 2025. And, therefore, for this reason his induction being a Junior Engineer, Civil, TES Grade-V(A) [Degree Holder] in the Public Works Department is considered to be a fresh appointment in the said post.
Further, it is also submitted that, as per Rule 35 (6) (a)
(ii) of the Tripura State Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1986 it is stated that "If a Government servant resigns or quits service, he may be granted, suo motu, by the authority competent to grant leave, cash equivalent in respect of earned leave at his credit on the date of cessation of
service, to the extent of half of such leave at his credit, subject to a maximum of 120 days (now it is 150 days)".
Further, it is also submitted that, transfer of GPF on Technical Resignation would be governed by Rule 35 of the General Provident Fund (Central Services) Rules, 1960.
Now, as per Rule 35 of General Provident Fund (Central Services) Rules, 1960 it is stated that "If a Government Servant who is a subscriber to any other non contributory Provident Fund of the Central Government or of a State Government is permanently transferred to pensionable service in a Department of the Central Government in which he is governed by these rules, the amount of subscriptions, together with interest thereon, standing to his credit in such other Fund on the date of transfer shall be transferred to his credit in the Fund:
Provided that where a subscriber was subscribing to a non contributory Provident Find of a State Government, the consent of that Government shall be obtained".
Copy of the Notification No.F.6(35)-PWD(E)/92 dated 10/12/2008 is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure- R/6.
Copy of the letter No.F.2(9)/ADC/Estt/2023 (shadow) dated 9th July, 2025 is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure R/7."
Further, at the time of hearing, Learned Addl. GA, Mr.
Karnajit De drawn the attention of this Court that since the petitioner
did not submit technical resignation as such, he is not entitled to the
benefit as claimed for. Learned Addl. GA further drawn the attention of
this Court referring Rule 14(3) of Central Civil Services (Pension)
Rules, 1972 (for short, CCS (Pension) Rules) and submitted that the
case of the petitioner is hit by the aforesaid CCS (Pension) Rules and
as such, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
5. The respondent-TTAADC also contested the case by filing
counter affidavit. In the counter affidavit they admitted the claim of
the petitioner. However, at the time of hearing, Learned Counsel, Mr.
Bhaskar Debbarma drawn the attention of this Court referring to a
communication dated 05.12.2003 (Annexure-R/1 to the counter
affidavit filed by respondent-TTAADC) by which the petitioner sought
for his release to join as Junior Engineer, in TES, Grade-V(A). Learned
Counsel for the respondent-TTAADC further drawn the attention of this
Court referring Annexure-R/2 submitted by the respondent-TTAADC
i.e. the release order dated 11.12.2003 by which the Executive Officer
(Admn.), TTAADC was pleased to release the petitioner along with
others to join in the new posting under PWD, Govt. of Tripura.
6. I have heard both the sides at length. I have also perused
the documents submitted along with the writ petition and the counter
affidavits submitted by the respective respondents.
7. In the case at hand, the claim of the petitioner was that
his prayer for counting of past service has been regretted by the
respondent authority. The respondent authority took the plea that the
petitioner at the time of departure from TTAADC did not apply for
technical resignation and in absence of submission of technical
resignation there is no scope to count the past service.
Now, let us reproduce the relevant provision of Section 14
(3) of CCS (Pension) Rules which provides as under:
"14(3) In the case of a Government servant belonging to a State Government, who is permanently transferred to a service or post to which these rules apply, the continuous service rendered under the State Government in an officiating or temporary capacity, if any, followed without interruption by substantive appointment, or the continuous service rendered under that Government in an officiating or temporary capacity, as the case may be, shall qualify:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-rule shall apply to any such Government servant who is appointed otherwise than by deputation to a service or post to which these rules apply."
From the aforesaid rule it appears to me that the same
would not attract the case of the petitioner.
8. Here, in the case at hand there is no evidence on record
that the petitioner was initially engaged to a Private organization
although he was serving under TTAADC, which also cannot be
excluded from the definition of State as mentioned under Article 12 of
the Constitution of India. The petitioner after obtaining NOC and
following due process of law appeared in the exam conducted by the
TPSC wherein he was duly selected and after that by office order dated
27.11.2003 he was appointed to the post of Junior Engineer (Civil),
TES, Grade-V(A) (Annexure-3 to the writ petition). From the said office
order it was specifically mentioned by the authority that those persons
are not entitled to pay protection but the benefit of their past service
for the purpose of pension is admissible, meaning thereby the
authority knowingfully the past service of the present petitioner and
others appointed them. So, at this stage where is the scope on the
part of the respondent authority to deny the said benefit to the present
petitioner?
Moreso, by the said office order another person Sri Prabal
Das was also appointed and he has also been given the same benefit
by the State. So, the plea of the respondent-State that the petitioner
did not submit any technical resignation is not a sound proposition of
law to deny the benefit of past service to the petitioner. Furthermore,
the petitioner approached the TTAADC for releasing him from his initial
service after getting selection through TPSC and the TTAADC authority
also duly released him on 11.12.2003 as mentioned above (supra)
(Annexure-R/2 to the counter affidavit filed by respondent-TTAADC). It
was submitted that from the resignation letter it would be apparent
that the resignation was filed under Rule 26(2) of the CCS (Pension)
Rules, 1972. So, on the plea of technical resignation there is no scope
to deny the benefit of past service to the petitioner.
Now, for convenience let us discuss Rule 26(2) of the CCS
(Pension) Rules, 1972 which provides as under:
"26(2) A resignation shall not entail forfeiture of past service if it has been submitted to take up, with proper permission, another appointment, whether temporary or permanent, under the Government where service qualifies."
On bare perusal of the aforesaid rule it is crystal clear that
here in the case at hand, the petitioner, after obtaining NOC from the
authority approached to TPSC and was subsequently selected. After his
selection, he again approached to the authority for releasing him from
his parent job in TTAADC to enable him to join his new place of posting
in the post of TES, Grade-V(A) under Government of Tripura.
Situated thus, there was no such scope on the part of the
respondent authority to deny his claim on the plea that he did not
submit any technical resignation. Admittedly, the present petitioner did
not mention the term "technical resignation" in his prayer, but, from
the prayer submitted by him to the TTAADC after his selection in TES,
Grade-V(A), it cannot be said that the same did not amount to a
technical resignation.
9. Further, the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances &
Pensions, Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India,
by an office memorandum dated 24.11.2022 clarified the term
"Technical Resignation", which runs as follows:
2.1 Technical Resignation 2.1.1 As per the Ministry of Finance OM No. 3379-E.III (B)/65 dated the 17th June, 1965, the resignation is treated as a technical formality where a Government servant has applied through proper channel for a post in the same or some other Department, and is on selection, required to resign the previous post for administrative reasons. The resignation will be treated as technical resignation if these conditions are met, even if the Government servant has not mentioned the word "Technical" while submitting his resignation. The benefit of past service, if otherwise admissible under rules, may be given in such cases. Resignation in other cases including where competent authority has not allowed the Government servant to forward the application through proper channel will not be treated as a technical resignation and benefit of past service will not be
admissible. Also, no question of benefit of a resignation being treated as a technical resignation arises in case of it being from a post held on ad hoc basis.
2.1.2 This benefit is also admissible to Government servants who have applied before joining the Government service and on that account the application was not routed through proper channel. The benefit of past service is allowed in such cases subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions:
(i) the Government servant should intimate the details of such application immediately on their joining;
(ii) the Government servant at the time of resignation should specifically make a request, indicating that he is resigning to take up another appointment under the Government for which he applied before joining the Government service;
(iii) the authority accepting the resignation should satisfy itself that had the employee been in service on the date of application for the post mentioned by the employee, his application would have been forwarded through proper channel."
From the aforesaid office memorandum it appears that
certain conditions have been mentioned regarding granting of past
service benefit.
Here, in the case at hand, the petitioner after obtaining
NOC appeared in the exam of TPSC and got selected and thereafter,
he approached his Department for releasing him to enable him to join
his new place of posting under PWD, Govt. of Tripura. The petitioner
was duly released by the TTAADC and the entire procedure was
followed through the Department step by step. Even, at the time of his
appointment under PWD, his candidature was accepted by the
authority of the State Government after considering all his previous
service experiences, thereby assuring him the benefit of counting his
past service. So, at this belated stage, the plea taken by the State-
respondents that the petitioner did not submit technical resignation
cannot be accepted as a sound proposition of law. Thus, the
respondents-State has failed to substantiate the plea taken in
opposition to the plea taken by the petitioner in the writ petition.
10. In the result, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is
hereby allowed. The impugned communication dated 10.09.2024
(Annexure-11 to the writ petition) is quashed and set aside. The
respondents authority is asked to ensure/release the benefit of past
service to the petitioner within a period of 3(three) months from the
date of passing of this judgment and order.
With this observation, the present writ petition stands
disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Snigdha
SNIGDH Digitally signed by SNIGDHA DAS
A DAS Date: 2026.04.13 18:11:52 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!