Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2151 Tri
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2026
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP(C) No.192 of 2026
Sri Sukumar Debbarma
---- Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Tripura & 5 Ors.
----Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirban Basak, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Debbarma, Addl. GA Mr. Kundan Pandey, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT Order 01/04/2026
Learned Counsel, Mr. Anirban Basak is present on behalf of the
petitioner.
Learned Addl. GA, Mr. Mangal Debbarma is present on behalf of
respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5. Learned Counsel, Mr. Kunday Pandey is
present on behalf of respondent No.4.
It is the case of the petitioner that inspite of having eligibility, the
Review Departmental Promotion Committee did not consider the petitioner
for promotion, which is in violation of Article 16 of the Constitution of India.
In view of the above, issue notice upon the respondents.
Since Learned Addl. GA, Mr. Mangal Debbarma appears and
accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5 and Learned
Counsel, Mr. Kundan Pandey appears and accepts notice on behalf of
respondent No.4, issuance of formal notice is waived.
The petitioner is to take steps for causing service of notice upon
the respondent No.6 both by normal process or by registered post with A/D
or Speed Post within 7(seven) days and file proof of service.
List the matter on 13.05.2026. In the meantime, the
respondents-State may file their reply, if they so desire, supplying copy to
the other side.
JUDGE
Snigdha
SNIGD Digitally signed by SNIGDHA DAS
HA DAS Date: 2026.04.02 17:18:08 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!