Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 69 Tri
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2025
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
CRP No.18 of 2025
Shri Bikash Dey
.........Petitioner(s);
Versus
Sri Amit Saha
.........Respondent(s).
For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Asmita Banik, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : None.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Order 14/05/2025
An additional affidavit has been filed by the defendant/petitioner
herein containing the order sheets of M.S. 96 of 2023 pending before learned
Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Court No.2, West Tripura, Agartala starting from
17.11.2023 till 10.04.2025. Defendant had appeared through learned counsel on
02.07.2024 along with vakalatnama executed in favour of his counsel.
Thereafter the matter was posted on 11.07.2024. By the order impugned herein
dated 11.07.2024, prayer for time on behalf of the defendant without filing any
vakalatnama was rejected and the case was fixed for hearing on summons for
judgment.
A perusal of the order sheets enclosed with the additional affidavit
shows that no further progress has been made in the trial. Plaintiff had preferred
a suit under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code for recovery of
money amounting to Rs.10 lakhs with interest. Evidently defendant sought time
to file written statement which was denied by the impugned order. Petitioner,
being aggrieved with the rejection of a time petition, has approached this Court.
Let notice be issued upon the respondent under ordinary process
and speed post for which requisites be filed within one week.
Notice is made returnable within five weeks.
In the meantime, the learned Trial Court shall submit a status
report of the trial in M.S. 96 of 2023.
(APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ
Pijush/ MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2025.05.15 17:00:33 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!