Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 545 Tri
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2025
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
IA No.1 of 2024
In Crl.A. No.29 of 2024
Shri Asish Debnath
---Applicant(s)
Versus
Smt. Nabasree Banik Debnath and Anr.
----Respondent(s)
For Applicant(s) : Ms. Ayantika Chakraborty, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dhiman Gope, Adv.
Mr. Rajib Saha, Addl. P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Order 12/02/2025 Learned Counsel Ms. A. Chakraborty is present for the
appellant-applicant.
Mr. Dhiman Gope, Learned counsel appears for the respondent
No.1 and Mr. Rajib Saha, Learned counsel appears for the
respondent No.2, i.e. State.
The appellant-applicant has preferred an appeal challenging the
judgment and order of acquittal dated 27.08.2024 passed by
Learned CJM, Gomati, Tripura in connection with CR(NI) No.21 of
2020 and along with memo of appeal, another application under
Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. for granting special leave to appeal and a
separate application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condoning
delay of 41 days is filed in preferring the appeal.
Heard both the sides at length.
Seen the contents of the application and also seen the grounds
as mentioned in the application for condonation of delay in para
No.2.
There is no objection from the side of the private-respondent
as well as State-respondent.
So considering all, the delay of 41(forty one) days in preferring
the appeal is hereby condoned.
Thus, the IA stands disposed of.
MOUMITA DATTA DATTA JUDGE Date: 2025.02.13 01:27:34 +05'30' Moumita
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!