Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 967 Tri
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Crl.Rev.P 34 of 2024
Sri Sandip Sinha.
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
Smt. Satabdi Sinha & Anr.
.......Respondent(s)
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Sinha, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s) : None.
Date of hearing and delivery of
Judgment & Order : 21.06.2024
Whether fit for reporting : NO.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
J U D G M E N T & O R D E R(ORAL)
This present Criminal Revision Petition has been filed by the
husband petitioner under Section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure against the order dated 21.03.2024 passed by Learned
Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar, Unakoti Tripura in connection with Case No.
Crl. Misc (125) 49 of 2023 wherein the Learned Family Judge has awarded
maintenance @Rs.17,000/-(seventeen thousand) per month and in addition to
that amount further amount of Rs.3000/-(three thousand) is imposed for paying
up the arrear maintenance. In total the sum comes to Rs.20,000/- (twenty
thousand).
2. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
i. Admit the petition.
ii. Call for the LC records in connection with vide No. Crl. Misc.(125) 49 of
2023 from the Court of the Ld. Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar, Unakoti Tripura.
iii. Issue notice upon the respondent.
iv. After hearing both sides your Lordship may be kind enough to set-aside the impugned order dated 21.03.2024 passed by the Ld. Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar, Unakoti Tripura in connection with case Crl. Misc (125) 49 of 2023 and pass further necessary order/orders as you Lordship may deem fit and proper.
3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 21.03.2024
passed by the Learned Judge, Family Court, Kailashahar, Unakoti Tripura in
connection with Case No.Crl. Misc (125) 49 of 2023 the present petition has
been preferred by the petitioner.
4. Heard Mr. R. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
None appears on behalf of the respondents.
5. Mr. Sinha, learned counsel submits before this Court that his client
is a member of Indian Air Force and is legally married husband/father of the
respondent no. 1 and 2. Mr. Sinha, also submits that his client tried his level
best to enjoy a happy conjugal life but failed to do so. According to him his
client has to look after his old mother beside this he has two mess due to his
outside posting and apart from this he has to bear expenses of several policies
under several schemes.
6. In view of the overall analysis made by the Learned Family Court
below and after going through the material evidence in its entirety, this Court is
of the view that the assessment of maintenance as awarded by the learned
Family Court is just and proper and needs no interference thus, the findings as
arrived by the learned Family Court stands affirmed. Consequently, the present
petition stands dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s) pending if
any, shall stand closed.
JUDGE
Paritosh
SABYASAC Digitally signed by SABYASACHI GHOSH
HI GHOSH Date: 2024.06.29 13:37:10 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!