Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tripura Jute Mill Karmachari Mancha vs Sri Santosh Das & Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 1122 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1122 Tri
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2024

Tripura High Court

Tripura Jute Mill Karmachari Mancha vs Sri Santosh Das & Others on 10 July, 2024

Author: Arindam Lodh

Bench: Arindam Lodh

                                        Page 1 of 2



                          HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                                AGARTALA
                             Cont.Cas(C) No.69 of 2023
Tripura Jute Mill Karmachari Mancha
                                                                       .........Petitioner(s);
                                          Versus
Sri Santosh Das & others
                                                            .........Respondent(s).

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharyya, G.A., Mr. P. Gautam, Advocate.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH

Order 10/07/2024

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.019776-019778 of 2023

preferred against the judgment passed in WA No.72/2018 dated 21.09.2022

was disposed of by the Apex Court with the following observations:

"Delay condoned.

After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, we are not inclined to interfere with the order impugned to except to say that the interest shall be leviable in terms of the order dated 25th October, 2016 in C.A. No.10411/2016 in particular paragraph 2 therein.

It has been brought to our notice that the contempt proceedings are pending. However, learned senior counsel seeks six months time to comply with the directions under the order impugned.

In our view, compliance be made by the appellants within a period of four months.

In view of the above terms, the special leave petitions are disposed of."

The instant contempt petition has been pending for non-

compliance of the directions passed in WA No.72/2018 since 26.04.2023. The

respondent-Managing Director, Tripura Jute Mills Limited has in his affidavit

dated 05.07.2024 stated that the State Government has released Rs.20 crore

against a request of Rs.75 crore to clear the outstanding liability. The State

Government has further advised the company to monetize its assets to bear the

required expenditure. Reference is also made to a communication dated

28.06.2024 [Annexure-R/7] addressed to the Ministry of Textiles, Government

of India by the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Tripura Jute Mills Limited

(TJML) indicating that for compliance of the order of this Court as upheld by

the Apex Court, the fund requirement is Rs.225.00 crore. Out of the released

fund of Rs.20 crore, arrears, salary and other dues of only 125 employees could

be paid. It is stated that TJML is a sick industry and a loss sustaining

organization. There is no production since 2021. This affidavit does not

properly disclose computation of the total amount required to clear the

outstanding liability for payment of the arrears of salary of the employees and

workers in terms of the order under offence. Learned counsel for the

respondent-Managing Director has made submissions that they are in the

process of liquidating the assets of the company, but there are no clear

averments in that regard. Learned counsel for the respondent Mr. P. Gautam

submits the company would be approaching the Apex Court for extension of

time to ensure compliance.

Be it indicated here that the six months period as stipulated by the

Apex Court in the judgment dated 04.09.2023 for compliance of the order has

already expired. The affidavit filed on 05.07.2024 also does not give a complete

picture as to the compliance of the order under offence in its letter and spirit.

As such, contempt proceedings need to be initiated for non-compliance of the

order under offence if the respondents are not able to get suitable extension of

time for compliance of the order. Therefore, in view of the request of learned

counsel for the respondent-company, the matter is adjourned for 3(three)

weeks. List it on 07.08.2024.

(ARINDAM LODH), J                                           (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ




Pijush/

MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA
           Date: 2024.07.11 15:38:09 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter