Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Swapna Deb(Debnath) vs The State Of Tripura And Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 386 Tri

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 386 Tri
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2022

Tripura High Court
Smt. Swapna Deb(Debnath) vs The State Of Tripura And Others on 31 March, 2022
                                  Page 1 of 2




                     HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                       _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_
                        WP(C) No.294 of 2022
Smt. Swapna Deb(Debnath)
                                                      ......Petitioner(s)

                                  VERSUS
The State of Tripura and others
                                                 ......Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samar Das, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bidyut Majumder, Asst. S.G., Mr. D.C. Saha, Advocate.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY _O_ R_ D_ E_ R_ 31/03/2022 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner namely,

Smt. Swapna Deb with the prayer seeking a direction to the respondents

to count the past service of the petitioner rendered as a School Mother on

consolidated pay for the purpose of computing retiral benefits along with

pensionary benefits and all other consequential benefits, if any.

Learned counsel for the petitioner drew the attention of this

Court to a judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court in case of

Smt. Mamata Rani Roy (Saha) versus State of Tripura and others in

WP(C) No.77 of 2015 wherein the petitioner therein similarly had sought

for computing retiral benefits and/or pensionary benefits by adding the

period of contractual service rendered by the petitioner prior to her

regularization in the post and this Court was pleased to direct that the

service rendered by the petitioner from the date of her joining as School

Mother on fixed pay basis pursuant to letter of appointment dated

30.05.1990 till her regularization shall be added to her regular service.

Learned counsel for the respondents fairly also accepts the

fact that the present case is covered by the judgment rendered by this

Court.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the

writ petition and directing the respondents to add the contractual period of

service rendered by the petitioner prior to her regularization and then re-

compute the pensionary and other benefits that she may be entitled to and

the same be released in favour of the petitioner within a period of 3(three)

months from today.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(INDRAJIT MAHANTY), CJ

Dipesh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter