Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. S. Lodh vs Mr. D. Bhattacharjee
2021 Latest Caselaw 936 Tri

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 936 Tri
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2021

Tripura High Court
Mr. S. Lodh vs Mr. D. Bhattacharjee on 17 September, 2021
                             Page 1 of 3


                   HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                        AGARTALA

                    WP(C) NO.365 OF 2021

         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH

Present:

For the Petitioner(s)         : Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s)         : Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, G.A.

Mr. Soumodeep Saha, Advocate.

17.09.2021

Order

Heard Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners as well as Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned G.A. along

with Mr. Soumodeep Saha, learned counsel appearing for the

respondents No. 1 and 2, and Mr. Raju Datta, learned counsel

appearing for the respondent no. 3.

By way of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioners

have prayed for the following reliefs:

"a. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other order/orders shall not be issued whereby quashing and cancelling the Memorandum No-F.20(1)-GA(P&T)/18, dated,20.08.2018, issued by the Respondent No-1, so far cancellation of the recruitment process initiated by the respective Departments or the TPSC, for the post of TCS, Grade-II, initiated vide Advertisement No-04/2016, dated,30.04.2016, conducted by the Respondent No.3 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) b. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other order/orders shall not be issued whereby commanding the Respondents that, the recruitment

process already initiated by the Tripura Public Service Commission for direct recruitment for the post of Tripura Civil Service (TCS) Grade-I, cannot be cancelled on the basis of the new recruitment policy, issued in the form of Notification, bearing No.F.20(1)-GA(P&T)/18, dated 05.06.2018, as all the recommendations made in the said Notification have been made prospective (Annexure-5 to the writ petition).

C. Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other order/orders shall not be issued whereby directing the Respondents to conclude the recruitment process to the TCS Grade-II, which was initiated in pursuance to the Advertisement No-04/2016 dated, 30.04.2016, issued by the TPSC AND Call for the records pertaining to the instant Writ Petition from the Custody of the Respondents and to make the rule absolute.

AND After hearing both the parties pass order/orders as this Hon'ble High Court considered fit and proper".

At the outset, Mr. Lodh, learned counsel, inviting my

attention to the judgment dated 03.12.2019 passed by a Division

Bench of this court in W.A. 142 of 2019, titled as State of Tripura

& another vs. Sri Samudra Debbarma, has submitted that the

petitioners want the similar reliefs, as granted by the Division

Bench of this court in W.A. 142 of 2019. The relevant part of the

order is as under:

"In view of the disposal of the appeal of the Government it would now be for the Government to complete the selection process for the post in question from the stage where it had been stopped. The remaining procedure may be completed within a period of 3 (three) months from today".

The present writ petition filed by the petitioners has been

disposed of with the same direction that the government would

take necessary steps to complete the selection process for the

post in question from the stage where it had been stopped

relating to the petitioners.

It is informed in the bar that the judgment passed in

Samudra Debbarma (supra) has been stayed by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court. The future of this case shall depend upon the

final decision of the Supreme Court.

The petitioners will be covered with the direction passed in

W.A. 142 of 2019 (State of Tripura and others vs. Samudra

Debbarma and another) subject to the decision of the Supreme

Court.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant

writ petition stands allowed and disposed of to the extent, as

indicated above.

JUDGE

suhanjit

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter