Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 259 Tri
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021
Page - 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
WP (C) 88 of 2016
M/s Tripura Ispat ............Petitioner(s)
Versus
The Union of India & 4 Ors. ............Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Sahewalla, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. P. Datta, Advocate.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY Order 01/03/2021
The petitioner has challenged the liability of the notifications dated
27.03.2008 and 10.06.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly stated that a
similar challenge has already been decided by the Supreme Court in Union of
India & Another Etc. Etc. Vs. M/s V.V.F Limited & Another Etc. Etc. (Civil Appeal
Nos. 2256-2263 of 2020 arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 28194-28201/2010). These
notifications are held to be legal and valid. In view of the said judgment, no further
orders are required to be passed in this petition and the same is disposed of
accordingly.
(S.G.CHATTOPADHYAY),J (AKIL KURESHI ),CJ
Rudradeep
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!