Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Venkata Balaji Bandaru vs The State Of Telangana
2026 Latest Caselaw 633 Tel

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 633 Tel
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

Venkata Balaji Bandaru vs The State Of Telangana on 10 April, 2026

       IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                       AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH
                                                  AND
                THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN

                           WRIT PETITION No.10814 of 2026

                                       DATED: 10.04.2026

Between:
Venkata Balali Bandaru, S/o. Venkata Narasimharao
                                                                                              ... Petitioner
                                                  AND

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Home Department, Secretariat,
Hyderabad & 3 others
                                                                                         ... Respondents

ORDER:

Heard Mr. Sunkara Kalyan Dileep, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, Mr. Mahesh Raje, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing

for respondent No.1 and Mr. B.Rajeshwar Reddy, learned Government Pleader

for State of Andhra Pradesh appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. The writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer:

"For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in freezing the Petitioner's bank account bearing Account No. 08521300001762 maintained at DCB Bank, Chandanagar, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, without authority of law, and violative of the Petitioner's fundamental rights; consequently direct Respondent No.4 to forthwith defreeze and restore full operation of the

Petitioner's bank account; restrain Respondent No.3 or any other authority from in any manner interfering with the operation of the said account; and pass such other or further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the order dated

07.03.2026 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati in

Criminal Petition No.1867 of 2026 whereby the Hon'ble Court has stayed all

further proceedings in F.I.R.No.63 of 2026 on the file of Kalidindi Police

Station, Eluru District till the next date of hearing. The matter has been posted

after eight weeks. The grievance of the petitioner is that in the meantime,

respondent No.3-Station House Officer has freezed the petitioner's Bank

Account in respondent No.4-Bank and paralysed his business operations.

Therefore, he has prayed for declaring the action of the respondents in freezing

the petitioner's bank Account bearing No.08521300001762 maintained at DCB

Bank, Chandanagar, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary, without authority of law

and violative of petitioner's fundamental rights.

4. However, learned Government Pleader for State of Andhra Pradesh has

submitted that the cause of action arises in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The

concerned F.I.R is pending before the competent Court of Criminal Jurisdiction

in Eluru District in the State of Andhra Pradesh and petitioner has also got an

interim protection from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Petition

No.1867 of 2026. Merely because respondent No.4-Bank falls in the

jurisdiction of the State of Telangana, the writ petition should not be entertained.

5. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, after some arguments, learned

counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ

petition in order to approach the jurisdictional Court for relief.

6. Liberty, as prayed for, is allowed.

7. Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid

liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ

______________________________________ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J

Date: 10.04.2026 KL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter