Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ghouseunnisa Begum vs Mr. Manish Kumar
2026 Latest Caselaw 523 Tel

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 523 Tel
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

Ghouseunnisa Begum vs Mr. Manish Kumar on 8 April, 2026

     IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                     AT HYDERABAD

       The Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Aparesh Kumar Singh
                                     and
                The Hon'ble Sri Justice G.M.Mohiuddin
                        Writ Appeal No.381 of 2026
                             Dated: 08.04.2026

Between:
Ghouseunnisa Begum,
w/o. Mir Sarwar Ali, aged about 87 years,
Occ: Household, R/o.Flat No.1, H.No.6-13/1,
Roshan Vihar Complex, Durga Bhavani Nagar,
Saroor Nagar, Champapet, Saidabad, Hyderabad.
                                                          ...Appellant
                                     and
Mr. Manish Kumar, S/o. late Mahavir Pershad,
Aged about 56 years, Occ: Business,
R/o. H.No.21-7-110, Mama Jameela Devdi,
Hyderabad and 4 others
                                                        ...Respondents

Judgment:

Heard Mr. Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel

appearing for Mr.Md.Ajmal Ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant

and Mr. Avinash Desai, learned Senior Counsel appearing for

Ms. Challa Apoorva Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.1

(writ petitioner).

2. Armed with the Order dated 08.04.2011, passed by the learned

writ court in W.P.No.24525 of 2008 and analogous cases, which was

upheld by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment

dated 10.07.2024 passed in Writ Appeal No.542 of 2011 and other ::2::

analogous appeals, the writ petitioner approached the Revenue

Divisional Officer (respondent No.4 herein) for restoring the name of

the writ petitioner and his family members in the revenue records. As

the Revenue Divisional Officer did not take any steps, the writ

petitioner approached the learned writ court by filing W.P.No.36693

of 2024. However, he did not implead the persons such as the

appellant, whose names would be replaced by the name of the writ

petitioner in the revenue records, as respondents in the said Writ

Petition. The learned writ court disposed of the aforesaid Writ

Petition, by Order dated 30.12.2024, with a direction to the Revenue

Divisional Officer to restore the entries as they stood prior

to 22.05.2007, in accordance with the provisions of the Telangana

Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2020 (Act No. 9

of 2020). Being aggrieved, the appellant, who was respondent No.5

in W.P.No.24525 of 2008 and appellant No.2 in Writ Appeal No.542

of 2011, approached this Court alleging that the impugned order of

the learned writ court dated 30.12.2024 has directed restoration of

entries in the revenue records in favour of the writ petitioner and his

family members without any notice to the appellant, whose name has

been existing in the revenue records till date.

::3::

3. The matter was adjourned on the previous date to enable the

learned Senior Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner to seek

instructions. Today, on instructions, he submits that if the matter is

remanded to the learned writ court, the writ petitioner will take steps

for impleading the appellant as a party to W.P.No.36693 of 2024, so

that the matter can be effectively heard and decided.

4. In view of the above facts and circumstances and taking into

account the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and since

the direction of the learned writ court to restore the entries in the

revenue records as they stood prior to 22.05.2007 affected the

appellant, who was party in the previous round of litigation but was

not impleaded in W.P.No.36693 of 2024, we are of the view that the

matter deserves to be remanded to the learned writ court for fresh

adjudication after impleading the appellant and any other affected

parties, whose names are likely to be deleted in case the name of the

writ petitioner is restored in the revenue records.

5. The impugned Order, dated 30.12.2024, passed in

W.P.No.36693 of 2024, is accordingly set aside. The matter is

remanded to the learned writ court to hear the writ petition afresh

after impleading necessary parties in accordance with law. Learned

writ court is requested to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

::4::

6. Subject to the above, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand

closed.

____________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ

___________________ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J Date: 08.04.2026 LUR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter