Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devaram Kumavat vs The State Of Telangana
2025 Latest Caselaw 5694 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5694 Tel
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2025

Telangana High Court

Devaram Kumavat vs The State Of Telangana on 26 September, 2025

     THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
             CRIMINAL PETITION No.12751 of 2025
ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by

the petitioner/accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings

against him in FIR No.333 of 2025 on the file of Afzalgunj Police

Station, Hyderabad District, registered for the alleged offences

punishable under Sections 125, 223(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS') and Section 20 (2) of The

Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of

Advertisement and Regulation of trade and Commerce,

Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (for short

'COTPA').

2. Heard Sri S.Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional

Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter

is squarely covered by the orders of this Hon'ble Court in

Crl.P.Nos.12333 of 2024, 152 of 2020 and batch and in several

other judgments. Hence, he prayed that the proceedings against

the petitioner be quashed.

ETD, J Crl.P_12751_2025

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor also submitted that

the issue raised in the present criminal petition is covered by the

earlier order passed in the aforementioned criminal petitions.

5. Perused the record. It is evident that the allegations in the

present case pertain to purchase and sale of Gutka packets,

which are similar to the allegations considered in Chidurala

Shyamsunder vs The State Of Telangana 1. In the said case it

was observed that the act of purchase and sale of gutka does not

fall under Section 270 of IPC as it does not spread any infectious

disease and further it is not a noxious food to attract the offence

under Section 273 of IPC. It is further observed that similar

orders have been passed in Crl.P.Nos.12333 of 2024, 152 of

2020 and batch, and in several other matters.

6. Since the allegations in the present case are similar to the

above said decisions, this criminal petition is allowed in terms of

the above said order. The proceedings against the

petitioner/accused No.1 in FIR No.333 of 2025 on the file of

Afzalgunj Police Station, Hyderabad District, are hereby

quashed. Further, the Station House Officer/Investigating Officer

Crl.P.No.3731 of 2018 & batch, decided on 27.08.2018

ETD, J Crl.P_12751_2025

is hereby directed to return the seized property on proper

identification and verification under due acknowledgment.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,

shall stand closed.

_____________________________ JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA 26.09.2025 gv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter