Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3372 Tel
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2025
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.346 of 2004
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed by the appellant aggrieved by the judgment and
decree dated 18.10.2003 in O.S.No.1167 of 1996 on the file of the IV Senior
Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
2. No representation by learned counsel for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the respondents appeared virtually.
3. When the matter came up for hearing on 07.02.2025, there was
no representation by the learned counsel for the appellant. Accordingly, the
matter was directed to be posted to 03.03.2025 under the caption 'for
dismissal.' On 03.03.2025, learned counsel for the appellant sought time for
seeking instructions from their client and posted to 24.03.2025 under the
same caption. Even today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing,
there is no representation by the learned counsel for the appellant.
4. Considering that the appeal is of the year 2004 and appellant is
not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter, the appeal is dismissed
for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in this petition if any,
shall stand closed.
____________________ Dr. G.RADHA RANI, J Date: 24th March, 2025 dgr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!