Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3229 Tel
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2025
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
AND
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRIT APPEAL No.329 of 2025
JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul):
Sri G. Satish Babu, learned counsel for the appellants;
Sri E. Venkata Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Municipal
Administration and Urban Development Department, for
respondent No.1 and Sri S.R. Vishnu Murthy, learned counsel
represents Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel
for respondent No.2.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants, during the course of
arguments, fairly admitted that if somebody's name is wrongly
mutated in the revenue records, the appellants have a remedy
under the revenue law to apprise the appropriate authority by
filing appropriate application/appeal. He submits that the
appellants may be given liberty to avail the said remedy and it
may be clarified that the order of learned Single Judge will not
come in their way.
3. The other side has no objection.
4. Accordingly, in view of consensus arrived at, this Writ
Appeal is disposed of. It is ordered that if the appellants avail
the remedy under the revenue law against the mutation
proceedings in favour of respondent No.2, the competent
authority shall consider and decide it in accordance with law.
Any finding given by learned Single Judge will not come in the
way of the appellants. The competent authority shall decide the
matter on its own merits. This Court has not expressed any
opinion on merits and on tenability of such application(s). No
costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
___________________ SUJOY PAUL, ACJ
____________________ RENUKA YARA, J
Date: 19.03.2025 Myk/Tsr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!