Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Guthikonda Nagabhushanam vs The State Of Telangana
2025 Latest Caselaw 2039 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2039 Tel
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2025

Telangana High Court

Guthikonda Nagabhushanam vs The State Of Telangana on 12 February, 2025

Author: Surepalli Nanda
Bench: Surepalli Nanda
          HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA


                WRIT PETITION No.4011 of 2025

ORDER:

Heard Sri Bhoopathi Ranjith Kumar, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of petitioner and learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Forest, appearing on behalf of

respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer

as under:

"...to issue any directions more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents more particularly the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in seizing the petitioner's vehicle i.e. JCB bearing No. TS 04 FJ 5327 in connection with the alleged offence in POR No 87 of 2024-2025 Of FRO KMM dated 26/12/2024 as illegal and arbitrary, and violation of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and CONSEQUENTLY direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to release the said petitioner's JCB bearing No.JCB bearing No. TS 04 FJ 5327 in connection with POR No.87 of 2024- 2025 Of FRO KMM dated 26/12/2024 and to pass...".

3. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on

behalf of the petitioner that the subject issue in the present writ

petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated

SN, J WP_4011_2025

22.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.18061 of 2024 and hence, the

present writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the

aforesaid order.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner relied on the covered order dated 22.07.2024

passed in W.P.No.18061 of 2024 in particular para No.9

and the same is extracted hereunder:

"9. Recording the above submission made by learned counsel on either side, and the reasons alike in WA No.838 of 2023, dated 22.08.2023, this writ petition is disposed of, with the following direction, directing the respondent authorities to release the petitioner's Tractor i.e., bearing No.AP-25-G-2102, subject to following conditions:

1. The petitioner shall furnish a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the respondents.

2. The petitioner, in addition, shall file an affidavit before the said Officer stating that she shall not alienate, encumber or transfer, in any manner, the said tractor.

SN, J WP_4011_2025

3. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking that she shall produce the aforesaid tractor as and when directed by the respondents.

4. The aforesaid affidavits shall be filed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests

disputes the same and submits that in pursuance to the

judgment of the Division Bench of Apex Court of India in

the case of State of Karnataka Versus K. Krishnan

reported in (2000) 7 Supreme Court Cases 80, petitioner

has to necessarily furnish a Bank Guarantee and a bond for a

sum of Rs.50,000/- would not suffice and in particular places

reliance on para Nos.7 and 8 of the said judgment. The

relevant portion of para Nos.7 and 8 of the said judgment

are extracted hereunder:

"7. The courts cannot shut their eyes and ignore their obligations indicated in the Act enacted for the purposes of protecting and safeguarding both the forests and their produce. The forests are not only the natural wealth of the country but also protector of human life by providing a clean and unpolluted atmosphere. We are of the considered view that when any vehicle is seized on the allegation that it was used for committing a forest offence, the same shall not

SN, J WP_4011_2025

normally be returned to a party till the culmination of all the proceedings in respect of such offence, including confiscatory proceedings, if any.

8. The approach adopted both by the Authorised Officer and the High Court completely ignores the importance of the forests and the purpose of the object for which the Act was made. As the appellant-State has not prayed for quashing the order of the Authorised Officer we refrain to deal with that even though we do not approve it. We are, however, satisfied that the High Court had adopted a very casual approach while disposing of the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Besides that the order impugned is contrary to law, we have our reservations with respect to the powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in the matter which we do not express in this case".

6. Taking into consideration:

(a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the

case,

(b) The submissions of the learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned

Assistant Government Pleader,

(c) The observations in the Judgment of the

Division Bench of the Apex Court in the case of "State of

SN, J WP_4011_2025

Karnataka Versus K.Krishnan" reported in (2000) 7 SCC

page 80 (referred to and extracted above),

The writ petition is disposed of with the following

conditions:

i) The petitioner shall furnish a bank guarantee for a sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Forest Divisional Officer, Khammam, Khammam District and the Forest Range Officer, Khammam, Khammam District.

ii) The petitioner in addition, shall file an affidavit before the said Officer stating that he shall not alienate, encumber or transfer, in any manner, the said vehicle i.e., JCB bearing No. TS04FJ5327 (shown as TS04FJ5327 in POR No. 87 of 2024-2025).

iii) The aforesaid affidavit shall be filed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

iv) The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking that he shall produce the aforesaid JCB bearing No. TS04FJ5327 as and when directed by the Forest Divisional Officer, Khammam, Khammam District and the Forest Range Officer, Khammam, Khammam District.

SN, J WP_4011_2025

7. With these above observations, the Writ Petition is

disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in

the Writ Petition shall also stand closed.

___________________________ MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA Date: 12.02.2025

Skj

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter