Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2006 Tel
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2025
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
AND
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRIT APPEAL Nos.181 & 182 of 2025
COMMON JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul):
Sri H. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel represents
Sri Vijay Kumar Panuganti, learned counsel for the appellant;
Ms. Pratusha Boppana, learned counsel for respondent No.1 in
W.A.No.181 of 2025; Sri Srikanth Hariharan, learned counsel
represents Sri V. Hariharan, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1
to 5 in W.A.No.182 of 2025; Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned
Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondent(s)-Revenue
Department.
2. This Intra-Court appeal takes exception to the common
order dated 06.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in
W.P.No.9522 & 9876 of 2014.
3. Admittedly, the challenge mounted in the writ petitions is
to the order dated 07.03.2014. The said order was set aside by the
Additional Collector, Ranga Reddy District on 14.08.2020 and the
matter was remitted back to the concerned authority to decide it
afresh.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant submits that
during the pendency of the writ petitions, there existed an order of
status quo and therefore, order dated 14.08.2020 could not have
been passed. However, he subsequently abandoned this prayer
and urged that a time limit may be fixed to the authority, before
whom the matter was remanded, to decide the matter within
stipulated time.
5. The other side raised objection.
6. Before the writ court, the order dated 07.03.2014 was
subject matter of challenge which was set aside by order dated
14.08.2020. If the appellant is aggrieved by the order dated
14.08.2020, he can challenge it in appropriate fresh proceedings.
If there is any delay in deciding the matter on remand, for that
purpose also, he may file appropriate fresh proceedings. There is
no occasion for the Division Bench to enter into that arena when
order dated 14.08.2020 or proceedings passed thereupon were not
subject matter of challenge and adjudication before learned Single
Judge.
7. With aforesaid, these Writ Appeals are disposed of. No
costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
___________________ SUJOY PAUL, ACJ
____________________ RENUKA YARA, J
Date: 11.02.2025 Myk/Tsr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!