Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Telangana vs Meera
2025 Latest Caselaw 6817 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6817 Tel
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2025

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

The State Of Telangana vs Meera on 1 December, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                         AT HYDERABAD

     THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH
                              AND
             THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHIUDDIN

                      I.A.No.1 of 2025
                           In/and
                WRIT APPEAL No.1201 OF 2025

                       Dated: 01.12.2025
Between:

The State of Telangana,
Rep., by its Principal Secretary,
School Education Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
                                                   ... Appellants

                               AND

Meera and another.
                                                ... Respondents.

JUDGMENT:

Mr. Santhapur Satyanarayana Rao, learned Government

Pleader for Services-I for the appellants.

Mr. B. Ashok, learned counsel for respondent No.1/writ

petitioner.

2. This appeal by the State of Telangana suffers from a delay

of 380 days. To explain the same, I.A.No.1 of 2025 has been

filed. Paragraph 4 of the said I.A. quoted hereunder contains

the explanation.

"It is submitted that, the orders of the Hon'ble High Court was received on 29.11.2024. The matter was addressed to the Director of School Education on 29.11.2024. The Director of School Education in turn addressed the matter to the Government on 06.01.2025. The Government requested to file Writ Appeal on 29.01.2025. The District Educational Officer was requested to furnish records for preparing Writ Appeal on 19.02.2025. The O/o the District Educational Officer has submitted the records after obtaining the necessary documents from the management of the school on 17.03.2025. After perusal of the records, a draft grounds of Writ Appeal is prepared on 27.04.2025. Thereafter, there was vacation for Hon'ble Court from 02.05.2025 to 08.06.2025. After reopening of the Hon'ble Court, the draft was sent to Hon'ble G.P office on 10.06.2025 for perusal and approval. The draft Writ Appeal was approved by the Government Pleader on 08.07.2025. Again the fair grounds of Writ Appeal were prepared on 12.09.2025 for filing the appeal in the Hon'ble High Court and in the interregnum the delay of (380) days were occurred which is neither willful nor wanton but for the reasons stated above and as such the same may be viewed leniently, If the delay is not condoned the Petitioners/Appellants herein will be put to lot of hardship."

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the

learned writ Court has directed the respondent State therein to

reconsider the case for approval of the petitioner's appointment

and thereafter, her absorption into the aided post. He has

referred to another judgment rendered by the learned appellate

Court in W.A.No.90 of 2025 dated 26.03.2025, which,

according to him, is in similar circumstances.

4. Learned counsel for respondent No.1/writ petitioner has

filed an objection to the delay condonation application taking

strong objection to the grounds urged.

5. We have considered the submissions of the learned

counsel for the parties.

6. On perusal of the interlocutory application, we find that

except paragraph 4 which reflects the usual movement of the

file through different desks, there is no justifiable cause to

explain such a huge delay of 380 days in filing the instant

appeal. We are therefore not inclined to condone the delay.

7. Further, on perusal of the impugned judgment, we find

that the learned writ Court has after setting aside the impugned

order dated 12.10.2020 directed the respondent State to

reconsider the case of the petitioner therein in the light of the

proposals of respondent No.5 which is the High School in the

matter of petitioner's appointment and thereafter, her

absorption into the aided post. Therefore, the learned writ

Court has left it open to the respondents/appellants herein to

take a decision upon such reconsideration.

8. Taking into the overall view of the matter, this Court finds

that no interference is required in the instant appeal.

9. Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is dismissed and

consequently, the writ appeal is also dismissed. There shall be

no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

closed.

______________________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ

______________________________________ G.M.MOHIUDDIN, J

Date: 01.12.2025 ES

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter