Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Banoth Gangaram vs The State Of Telangana
2025 Latest Caselaw 1663 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1663 Tel
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2025

Telangana High Court

Banoth Gangaram vs The State Of Telangana on 12 August, 2025

      THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

                 WRIT PETITION No.23789 of 2025

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in not giving a

notice under Section 35 of Bhariya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

(for short "BNSS"), 2023 in violation of judgment passed in

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar & Another 1, the present Writ

Petition is filed. A consequential prayer is made to direct

respondent No.3 to issue notice under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023.

2. The brief facts of the case as stated are that the petitioners

are the residents of Malkapur Thanda, which falls under the

jurisdiction of Mandal cum District of Nizamabad. The

petitioners claims to be the absolute owners of the land

admeasuring Ac.1-25 guntas situated in Survey No.115 of

Mallaram Village, Mandal cum District of Nizamabad. The

petitioner No.1 entered into an agreement of sale of land with

respondent No.4. The respondent No.4 has paid an advance

amount of Rs.10,00,000/- and the remaining amount has to be

paid within a period three (03) months, as assured by the un-

official respondent. Believing the words of respondent No.4, the

petitioners entered into the agreement, that the transaction

would be completed as agreed there upon. It is further

AIR 2014 SC 2756

submitted that the respondent No.4 without paying the total sale

consideration amount, attempted to encroach upon the

petitioner's land. When the petitioners questioned such

encroachment, the respondent No.4 resorted to using filthy

language in the name of caste and personal character. Aggrieved

by these acts, the petitioners approach the Nizamabad Police

and lodged a complaint against respondent No.4. However, no

complaint was registered against him till date. The respondent

No.4 retaliated by filing a false complaint against the petitioners.

As a result, FIR has been filed against the petitioners.

3. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties

arises out of a civil transaction i.e. an agreement of sale involving

land and payment of consideration, which cannot be given a

criminal color.

4. It is further submitted that FIR No.74/2025 was registered

under Sections 329(3), 324, 318(4), 351(2) read with 3(5) of BNS

Act against the petitioners at Nizamabad Rural Police Station.

Thereafter, the petitioners voluntarily presented themselves

before the police and provided a detailed explanation of the

events and requested the police to issue a notice under Section

35 of BNSS.

5. Learned counsel would submit that the petitioner has

made a complaint on 28.07.2025 against respondent No.3,

for threatening arrest and compelling compromise with

respondent No.4 in violation of Section 35(3) of BNSS,

calling to police station and detaining till night and

requested to take action accordingly.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for

respondent Nos.1 to 3.

7. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on

instructions submits that the petitioner has already made a

representation. The respondent No.3 would follow the procedure

and issue notice under Section 35 of BNSS to the petitioners

enabling them to pursue the remedies and would also submit

that the petitioners have to co-operate with the investigation.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that if a notice

is issued under Section 35 of BNSS to the petitioners, the

petitioners will co-operate with the investigation.

9. In that view of the matter, recording the submissions of the

learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Home, this Writ Petition is disposed of

directing the respondent No.3 to issue notice under Section 35 of

BNSS within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt

of a copy of this order enabling the petitioners to pursue their

remedies.

10. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with consent.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in this

petition, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

Date: 12.08.2025

Note:

Issue CC by today b/o Nsk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter