Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dodla Sarada vs The State Of Telangana
2024 Latest Caselaw 4077 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4077 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2024

Telangana High Court

Dodla Sarada vs The State Of Telangana on 14 October, 2024

          THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
                                            AND
               THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
                              Writ Appeal No.1168 of 2024
JUDGMENT:

(Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)

Mr. Vadeendra Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government

Pleader for Revenue Department appears for the respondents.

2. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the

matter is heard finally.

3. This intra court appeal is directed against order

dated 03.06.2024, passed by a learned Single Judge in

W.P.No.19808 of 2023, by which the writ petition preferred by

the appellant has been disposed of with liberty to the appellant

to approach the competent civil court for declaration of title.

4. Facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly stated are

that the appellant claims to be the owner and in possession of

land bearing plot No.11 admeasuring 1000 square yards in ::2::

survey Nos.321/18/AA, 321/18/EE and 321/18 situated at

Kadthal Village, Maisigandi Gram Panchayat, Amangal Mandal,

Mahaboobnagar District (for short 'the subject property') on

the basis of a registered sale deed dated 15.07.2015. The

aforesaid land was developed into house plots after getting

conversion from the Revenue Divisional Officer,

Mahaboobnagar Division and the appellant purchased one of

the open plots. However, the land bearing Survey No.321 was

classified as 'lavani patta' and was kept under prohibited list

under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short

'the Act').

5. The appellant thereupon submitted a representation

seeking release of the land from the prohibitory list under

Section 22-A of the Act. However, the representation

submitted by the appellant failed to evoke any response.

Thereupon, the appellant filed the aforesaid writ petition. The

learned Single Judge, by the impugned order dated 03.06.2024, ::3::

inter alia held that the appellant has disputed the nature of land

and is also claiming title on the basis of a registered sale deed.

Therefore, the appellant was granted the liberty to approach

the competent civil court and thereafter, to submit a

representation. In the aforesaid factual background, this appeal

has been filed.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the

learned Single Judge ought to have appreciated that the

appellant had a statutory remedy under Section 22-A(4) of the

Act and the learned Single Judge ought to have directed the

respondents to consider and decide the representation in view

of mandate contained in Section 22-A(4) of the Act.

7. Learned Government Pleader fairly submitted that the

representation submitted by the appellant deserves to be dealt

with in accordance with law under Section 22-A(4) of the Act.

::4::

8. We have considered the rival submissions made on both

sides and have perused the record.

9. Section 22-A(4) of the Act is extract below for the facility

of reference:

"The State Government either suo motu or on an application by any person or for giving effect to the final orders of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh or Supreme Court of India may proceed to denotify, either in full or in part, the notification issued under sub-section (2)."

10. Thus, the appellant has the statutory remedy under the

Act. Therefore, the State Government is directed to decide

the representation submitted by the petitioner by a speaking

order within a period of two months from the date of receipt

of a copy of the order passed today without being influenced

by any of the observations made in the order passed by the

learned Single Judge .

::5::

11. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any

opinion on the merits of the matter and the grievance of the

appellant has to be redressed by the State Government.

12. To the aforesaid extent, order dated 03.06.2024, passed

by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.19808 of 2023, is

modified.

13. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand

closed.

__________________ ALOK ARADHE, CJ

___________________ J.SREENIVAS RAO, J Date: 14.10.2024 LUR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter