Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ch.Narsi Reddy vs V.Yellaiah
2024 Latest Caselaw 3197 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3197 Tel
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2024

Telangana High Court

Ch.Narsi Reddy vs V.Yellaiah on 9 August, 2024

             THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

                    M.A.C.M.A.No.3879 of 2014

JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed by the claimant aggrieved by the

award dated 18.12.2013 in O.P.No.149 of 2011 passed by the

Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-IX Addl. Chief

Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad.

2. Heard both sides and perused the entire material on

record.

3. The claim petition was filed seeking compensation of

Rs.6,50,000/- for the injuries sustained by the claimant in the

motor vehicle accident and the Tribunal has granted

compensation of Rs.3,61,000/- with interest @ 7% per annum

from the date of petition till the date of deposit.

4. The case of the claimant is that on 29.10.2009, while

the claimant along with were travelling in an auto, the offending

vehicle which is a tractor and trailer driven by its driver in a

rash and negligent manner with high speed came in opposite

direction and hit the auto resulting in the claimant receiving

fracture injuries, which are 1) Liver laceration with contusion

segments 6th and 7th with moderate haemoperitoneum, 2) KS, J MACMA_3879_2014

compound grade-II fracture right shaft humerus at middle 3rd,

3) right rib fracture 5, 6, 7 and 8th with mild haemothorax and

4) shaft tissue injury right shoulder (avulsion injury). As per

Ex.A7 disability certificate, he sustained 50% permanent partial

disability.

5. The liability of the Insurance company and the injuries

are not in dispute, so also disability of the claimant. The Doctor

who treated the claimant was also examined as PW2 regarding

injuries and disability factor.

6. Learned counsel for the claimant would submit that

though the claimant availed Arogya scheme, he paid certain

bills by way of cash. Further, the learned Tribunal has granted

meager amounts under different heads though the claimant had

sustained grievous injuries resulting disability.

7. Learned counsel for the Insurance company would

submit that the learned Tribunal granted just and reasonable

compensation.

8. There is no dispute regarding grant of compensation of

Rs.2,97,000/- towards disability.

KS, J MACMA_3879_2014

9. The Tribunal has rightly not considered the medical

bills, which the claimant alleged to have paid in cash with a

finding that he availed Arogya scheme. Hence, this Court is not

inclined to interfere with the said finding.

10. The Tribunal has granted an amount of Rs.50,000/-

towards grievous injury, Rs.10,000/- towards simple injuries

and however, no amount was granted towards pain and

suffering. As the petitioner has sustained grievous injuries

resulting in disability, this Court is inclined to grant an amount

of Rs.60,000/- towards grievous injury, Rs.20,000/- towards

simple injuries and Rs.50,000/- towards pain and suffering.

11. The Tribunal has granted only an amount of Rs.2,000/-

towards extra nourishment and Rs.2,000/- towards

hospitalization. Hence, this court is inclined to grant an amount

of Rs.10,000/- each for extra nourishment, transportation and

attendant charges.

12. In the light of the above discussion, the claimant is

entitled for the following compensation under different heads:

KS, J MACMA_3879_2014

Head Compensation awarded

(1) Grievous injury Rs.60,000

(2) Simple injuries Rs.20,000

(3) Disability Rs.2,97,000

(4) Pain and suffering Rs.50,000

(5) Extra nourishment Rs.10,000

(6) Transportation Rs.10,000

(7) Attendant charges Rs.10,000

Total compensation awarded Rs.4,47,000/-

13. In the result, the Motor Accident Miscellaneous Appeal

is partly allowed enhancing the compensation amount awarded

by the Tribunal from Rs.3,61,000/- to Rs.4,47,000/- as

hereunder:

(a) The enhanced amount shall carry interest at 7.5%

p.a. from the date of petition till the date of realization.

(b) The respondents shall deposit the amount within a

period of (8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of

judgment. On such deposit, claimant is permitted to

withdraw entire amount without furnishing any

security.

KS, J MACMA_3879_2014

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

closed. No order as to costs.

__________________ K.SURENDER, J Date : 09.08.2024 gvl

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter