Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2770 Tel
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2023
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9510 OF 2023
O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioners -
accused Nos.2 and 3 to quash the proceedings against them in
C.C.No.12527 of 2019 pending on the file of VII Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally at Hyderabad. The offence
alleged against the petitioners is under Section 420 read with Section
34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC')
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri S.Ganesh,
learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 - State and
perused the record.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the
petitioners are innocent and a false complaint has been foisted
against them by the de-facto complainant with all false allegations.
Learned counsel further contended that the police without due
investigation filed charge sheet against the petitioners. Therefore,
prayed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners.
GAC,J Crl.P.No.9510_2023
4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor
contended that the police has filed charge sheet against the
petitioners only after due investigation and that it is not a fit case to
quash the proceedings against the petitioners at this juncture as the
matter has to be decided only after conducting trial by the Trial Court.
5. On a perusal of the charge sheet, this Court is of the view that
truth or otherwise of the allegations made against the petitioners can
be decided only after conducting trial. Hence, this Court is not
inclined to interfere with the proceedings against the petitioners.
6. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners - accused
Nos.2 and 3 are the senior citizens and parents of accused No.1, this
Court is of the considered opinion that the appearance/attendance
of the petitioners - accused Nos.2 and 3 before the trial Court shall be
dispensed with.
7. Accordingly, the appearance/attendance of the petitioners -
accused Nos.2 and 3 before the Court of VII Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally at Hyderabad in C.C.No.12527 of
2017 is dispensed with, unless their presence is required by the trial
Court for a specific purpose or at the time of recording examination
under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and on the date of pronouncement of
judgment. Further, the petitioners are at liberty to move an GAC,J Crl.P.No.9510_2023
application before the trial Court seeking to discharge them from the
case. On such application being filed and if any prima facie case is
not made out against them, the trial Court shall consider the same
and pass appropriate orders within a period of three (03) weeks from
the date of filing of the said discharge petition without being
influenced by any of the observations made by this Court in this order.
8. Subject to the above directions, this Criminal Petition is disposed
of.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY, J Date: 27.09.2023 ns
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!