Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2445 Tel
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2023
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1660 OF 2023
ORDER:
The instant Civil Revision Petition has been filed
assailing the order dated 14.04.2023, passed by the
Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in Transfer
Original Petition No.47 of 2023.
2. Heard Sri E.Sreenivas Rao, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri Damodar Mundra, learned counsel for
the respondents.
3. The challenge was primarily on the ground that
the suit filed by the petitioner and which is pending
consideration before the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil
Court, Hyderabad, was time barred. That for this an
application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 26
of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, so far as the limitation
part is concerned was filed.
4. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing,
it has been informed that the application moved by the
petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 26
of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, has been rejected vide
order dated 12.09.2023. In the light of the application
under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 26 of Civil
Procedure Code, 1908, stands rejected, as a
consequence, the suit would have to be now decided on
its own merits.
5. Considering the fact that two suits i.e. O.S.No.696
of 2021 and O.S.No.566 of 2022, the former pending
before the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court,
Hyderabad, and the later pending before the III
Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, are
between the same parties and also in respect of the
same suit property. In the opinion of this Court for
avoidance of conflicting judgment in the two suits and
also taking into consideration the convenience of the
litigating parties, it would be in the larger interest of
justice that the two suits are ordered to be taken up
and decided together.
6. In the given circumstances, this Court is of the
opinion that since O.S.No.566 of 2022 which is pending
before the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court,
Hyderabad, it would be more appropriate if the
O.S.No.696 of 2022 is ordered to be transferred to the
Court of III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,
Hyderabad, for proceeding with the matters together on
its own merits in accordance with the law.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has given his no
objection if the suit from the Court of IV Senior Civil
Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is transferred to the
court of III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,
Hyderabad, knowing fully well of the consequences
thereof.
8. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition
stands allowed. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court,
Hyderabad, is ordered to transfer the O.S.No.696 of
2021 pending before the file of IV Senior Civil Judge,
City Civil Court, Hyderabad, to the file of III Additional
Chief Judge, City Civil Court. It is made clear that this
Court has not expressed any opinion so far as the
merits of the case is concerned. The rights of the either
parties would remain intact to be adjudicated before the
Court below by taking their respective stand including
the 15-A application that has been filed by the
respondent in O.S.No.696 of 2021. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any
pending, shall stand closed.
__________________ P. SAM KOSHY, J
Date: 15.09.2023 GSD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!