Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1077 Tel
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2023
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9995 OF 2021
O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by the
petitioner/Accused, to quash the docket order dt.23.11.2017
passed in Crl.M.P.No.4994 of 2017 in Crl.M.P.No.617 of 2017
in Crl.A.No.315 of 2013 on the file of the Court of Learned
I Additional District & Sessions Jude, Ranga Reddy District at
L.B.Nagar.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State.
Perused the record.
3. The complainant filed Crl.A.No.315 of 2013, challenging
the Judgment dt.29.04.2013 passed by the learned IX Special
Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, L.B.Nagar, R.R.District, in
C.C.No.74/2012, whereby the learned Magistrate acquitted
the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of
the Negotiable Instruments Act.
4. The learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad,
by order dt.25.07.2014, allowed the Crl.A.No.315 of 2013
setting aside the Judgment of learned Magistrate. Aggrieved
by the said Judgment passed in Crl.A.No.315 of 2013, the
accused filed Criminal Revision Case No.484 of 2020 before
this Court.
5. The complainant filed Crl.MP.No.4994/2017 in
Crl.M.P.No.617 of 2017 in Crl.A.No.315 of 2013 under
Section 174(A) of the Indian Penal Code before the Court
below praying to pronounce the accused as a proclaimed
offender and the learned Sessions Judge by docket order
dt.23.11.2017 passed the following order:
"The petitioner filed petition under Section 174(A) IPC submitting that the accused has no properties. Police also submitted that accused has no properties. Hence, the accused is hereby declared as proclaimed offender on the event of the arrest of accused, he shall undergo the simple imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs only) out of which Rs.10,90,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Ninety Thousand only) shall be paid as compensation to the appellant/complainant herein under Section 357(1) Cr.P.C. In the result, the petition is allowed."
6. Aggrieved the aforesaid order, present criminal petition
is filed by the accused.
7. This Court in IA.No.1 of 2020 in Crl.RC.No.484 of 2020
passed order dated 14.11.2022 which reads as follows;
"Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is a delay of 2167 of days in filing the Criminal Revision Case. He also represented that he is ready to prove his bonafides by paying some amount to respondent/party-in-person. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to pay Rs.11,00,000/- within a period of one month. Post this matter on 14.12.2022 and he is directed to pay the said amount and after proving his bonafides, the petitioner will be considered."
8. Thereafter, when the case had come up on 20.12.2022,
this Court passed order which reads as follows:
"The respondent-party in person submitted that no amount was deposited by the petitioner as undertaken by him before this Court on 14.11.2022.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner requested for extension of two (02) months time for depositing the amount of Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Only). The respondent objected for the same contending that the petitioner was taking time but was not depositing any amount. Hence, the petitioner is directed to deposit an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) by 30.12.2022 and the balance amount to be paid by 20.01.2023 to prove his bonafides.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is also directed to furnish the correct address of the petitioner."
9. Both the counsel for petitioner and respondent/party-
in-person are present.
10. The order passed by this Court on 14.11.2022 and
20.12.2022 directing the petitioner to deposit the amount
was not complied with.
11. Though this Court by order dated 20.12.2022 ordered to
pay Rs.5 lakhs by 30.12.2022 and the balance to be paid on
20.01.2023, the petitioner/accused violated the said order
12. In the said circumstances, I do not find any reasons to
keep this Crl.P.No.9995 of 2021 pending which is filed to stay
the proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.4994 of 2017 in
Crl.M.P.No.617 of 2017 in Crl.A.No.315 of 2013, including
the arrest of the petitioner.
13. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is hereby dismissed.
This Court deems it appropriate to direct the I Additional
District and Sessions Judge to issue Non-bailable Warrants
to the petitioner/accused and cause his appearance and send
him to prison for the reason of non-payment of the amount as
directed by this Court, earlier. (Since the Magistrate Court
which is IX Special Magistrate, Hasthinapur, Ranga Reddy
District was abolished, the direction is given to the learned
Sessions Judge)
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
__________________ K.SURENDER, J Date: 06.03.2023 tk
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.9995 OF 2021
Dt.06.03.2023
tk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!