Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Chadamalla Ananda Kumari vs Smt. Upperla Vena Rani
2023 Latest Caselaw 4306 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4306 Tel
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2023

Telangana High Court

Smt. Chadamalla Ananda Kumari vs Smt. Upperla Vena Rani on 12 December, 2023

           THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.281 OF 2023


ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure

Code (for short 'C.P.C.'), praying the Court to transfer O.S.No.32 of

2021 pending on the file of Agent to the Government, at

Kothagudem, Bhadrari-Kothagudem District, to the file of Principal

Junior Civil Judge, at Kothagudem.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners herein filed

O.S.No.32 of 2021 before the Agent to Government, at Kothagudem,

Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, under Rule 7 of the Agency Rules,

1924, seeking partition and separate possession of suit schedule

property. In the said suit, the petitioners also filed I.A.No.21 of 2022

under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2, read with Section 151 of C.P.C.,

seeking ad interim injunction restraining the respondents from

alienating the petition schedule property in favor of any third

parties.

3. Heard learned counsel for petitioners. In spite of service of

notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondents.

SKS, J

4. Learned counsel for petitioners contends that though

O.S.No.32 of 2021 was filed in the month of December, 2021, and

defendants also contested the matter, the trial Court did not take

up the matter for hearing and kept on granting adjournments, due

to which justice is not served to petitioners. As such, prayed this

Court to transfer O.S.No.32 of 2021 pending on the file of Agent to

the Government, at Kothagudem, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District,

to the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Kothagudem.

5. In support of the said contention, learned counsel for

petitioners relied on the judgment rendered by the High Court of

Andhra Pradesh in J.Sitarama Rao and Another Vs. State of

Andhra Pradesh 1. Relevant paragraph No.24 reads as under:

"In view of the above discussion we are clearly of the

view that the Agency Court constituted under the

Scheduled Districts Act and the Andhra Pradesh

Agency Rules framed thereunder is a Court

subordinate to the High Court and the High Court

has power under Section 24, Civil Procedure Code to

transfer the suit pending in such Agency Court

either to an other Agency Court or a Civil Court.

However, on such transfer the said suit would have

to be tried in accordance with the same law and

1978 AIR (Andhra Pradesh) 82 SKS, J

procedure as would have been applicable to that suit

if it were to continue before the Agency Court."

6. On going through the material available on record, it is noted

that though petitioners filed O.S.No.32 of 2021 in the month of

December, 2021, before the Agent to Government, at Kothagudem,

Bhadrari-Kothagudem District, and thereafter, I.A.No.21 of 2022

was also filed under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2, read with Section

151 of C.P.C., there is no progress in the matter even till date.

7. The contention of the petitioner is that there is no progress in

the suit proceedings and even I.A., is not disposed of by the Court.

On the ground of delay in disposal, the transfer of suit to the civil

Court is not permissible as there is separate procedure for trial of

cases in Agency Court and C.P.C., is not applicable to the agency

area. There is no dispute that this Court has power to transfer the

cases under Section 24 of the C.P.C., and that Agency Court is

subordinate to this Court, as held in J. Sitarama Rao (supra), but

mere delay in disposal of the case cannot be a ground for transfer of

the case. Moreover, transfer of the case is not a solution for disposal

of the case. Therefore, there are no grounds in the present

Tr.C.M.P., and the same is liable to be dismissed.

SKS, J

8. Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is

dismissed. However, the Agent to the Government, at Kothagudem,

Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, is directed to dispose of O.S.No.32

of 2021 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of

six (6) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There

shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Tr.C.M.P.,

shall stand closed.

______________ K. SUJANA, J

Date :12.12.2023 PT SKS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

P.D. ORDER IN TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.281 OF 2023

DATE:12.12.2023

PT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter